So, I was sitting in the bath last night, singing an appropriate ditty from the oeuvre of Flanders and Swann, and musing on the metallurgy of Dark Age and mediaeval sword blades, as you do…
Anyway, I started thinking about the places that had notable reputations for steel in general, and sword blades in particular, and I remembered, from somewhere, the story of how blades from Damascus were supposed to have a special keenness and general high quality, because they were tempered by being thrust, while still red-hot, through the (briefly) living body of a slave. And it occurred to me to wonder whether this story had any particular credibility to it.
On the one hand, our forefathers had a, well, robust attitude to life and death, and I could imagine them thinking that one slave was a small price to pay for a decent edge. And I do know that metallugists have, over time, experimented with a wide range of tempering processes.
On the other hand, the mediaeval Middle East wasn’t that barbaric a society… reasonably enlightened, in fact, by the standards of the times. And slaves, though deprived of freedom, still usually retained some rights under many legal systems. Not to mention that a slave often was a valuable commodity, surely (one would think) too much so to be sacrificed on such a one-shot basis.
So. Any authenticated accounts of this? Are we dealing with a fascinating but gruesome phase of the history of metallurgy, or a gross libel upon a civilised ancient culture? I welcome any incisive comments upon this particularly pointed question (oh, come on, you knew I was going to do that…)