Perky 1960s breasts

[QUOTE=Danalan]
Really? I think it seems like the obvious result. Try this simple experiment: Step 1) Draw a face on a balloon. Step 2) Blow up the balloon. Step 3) See what I mean?
[/QUOTE]

No, because breasts are not balloons. That explains why, say, the mole on the skin of my breast got larger as my breasts did, but nipples are discrete organs which happen to be located in the middle of the breast.

Draw the picture on the bottom of your balloon, using the part you blow into as a nose. Now blow it up and tie it. Is the nose huge? No, because you only blew up the balloon part, not the stem attached to it.

[QUOTE=WhyNot]
Draw the picture on the bottom of your balloon, using the part you blow into as a nose. Now blow it up and tie it. Is the nose huge? No, because you only blew up the balloon part, not the stem attached to it.
[/QUOTE]
Thanks alot, WN. Now I have the image of a woman whose nipples came untied, and is flying around the room backwards.

[QUOTE=Cervaise]
How did they airbrush out the smallpox scars before, y’know, airbrushing?
[/QUOTE]

Paintbrushes, obviously. But it’s not as if the airbrush is that recent an invention

From http://www.medea-artool.com/artool/archives/2000FEB-AIRMAG/historyof%20theairbrush/historyofairbrush.htm

[QUOTE=tesseract]
Not true, at least in my case. My nipples & areolae used to be small – now they seem huge. I really do not like the nipple effect. I wish I had an “oddly small looking nip on a big boob.”
[/QUOTE]

Cite? :smiley: