Perky 1960s breasts

[WhyNot]

@Danalan

Really? I think it seems like the obvious result. Try this simple experiment: Step 1) Draw a face on a balloon. Step 2) Blow up the balloon. Step 3) See what I mean?

No, because breasts are not balloons. That explains why, say, the mole on the skin of my breast got larger as my breasts did, but nipples are discrete organs which happen to be located in the middle of the breast.

Draw the picture on the bottom of your balloon, using the part you blow into as a nose. Now blow it up and tie it. Is the nose huge? No, because you only blew up the balloon part, not the stem attached to it.

[Fear_Itself]

@WhyNot

Draw the picture on the bottom of your balloon, using the part you blow into as a nose. Now blow it up and tie it. Is the nose huge? No, because you only blew up the balloon part, not the stem attached to it.

Thanks alot, WN. Now I have the image of a woman whose nipples came untied, and is flying around the room backwards.

[slaphead]

@Cervaise

How did they airbrush out the smallpox scars before, y’know, airbrushing?

Paintbrushes, obviously. But it’s not as if the airbrush is that recent an invention

From http://www.medea-artool.com/artool/archives/2000FEB-AIRMAG/historyof%20theairbrush/historyofairbrush.htm

With the invention of the Daguerreotype in 1839, the need to retouch photographs quickly became obvious, but the only way to do it was by hand brushing, which was imprecise and left brush strokes.
…
The sometimes unflattering reality of photographed images posed a particular new problem, and the airbrush provided a useful solution.

By the late 1890s, photographs became so popular that retouching factories were needed to meet the demand, employing scores of workers to add color and improve the images, all done with the airbrush.

[An_Gadai]

@tesseract

Not true, at least in my case. My nipples & areolae used to be small – now they seem huge. I really do not like the nipple effect. I wish I had an “oddly small looking nip on a big boob.”

Cite?