[QUOTE=John Mace]
Is there any evidence that dogs are any less social? I’m not aware of any.
Usually, the dog will “bond” with its human owner(s), thinking it’s part of that pack. Or so the hypothesis goes. I’m not aware of any evidence that wolf pups raised by humans would be any different. That doesn’t mean they don’t have a different temperament (it’s pretty clear that they do), but it also doesn’t mean that they are any more or less social and would suffer any more or less by being alone than a dog would.
One might argue that a dog is even more at risk, since it seems to have retain a lot more juvenile behaviors as an adult, and juveniles are probably more in need of a social group than adults would be. That’s conjecture, of course, but in thinking about this I just can’t see that dogs are less vulnerable than wolves to living without a proper pack of other dogs/wolves.
[/QUOTE]
This is also conjecture, but I watched a program about this just last night. The program explained how dogs of today come from many, many years of human selective breeding. Humans knew what traits they needed for the dogs to meet certain needs of the humans.
For working dogs they needed special abilities, like running quickly or swimming. But they also needed to be trainable by humans. Ability to respond well to humans was always an important part of the mix. So I would think that our domesticated dogs are much better suited to accept humans as part of their packs. Generations before them have worked with and relied on humans. It comes naturally to them because that is in part what they were selectively bred for.
A wolf pup raised by humans wouldn’t have all those generations preceding them that accepted humans as part of their pack. In fact, the wolf pups would have centuries of fear and distrust of humans in their genetic make-up. It would be very unlikely that the wolf pup would consider humans as part of their pack.
In the show they discussed a guy in Russia who was trying to bred wolves and dogs to produce an animal who would excel in police work. It took several generations of chosing the most people friendly of the hybrid pups to produce a hybrid who could work well with humans. Most of even the hybrids still showed a fear of humans and could not be worked with and trained. They felt the only reason they had any success at all was because the founding mother wolf was a rare people-friendly wolf. She had actually rejected mating with wolves, and preferred a dog.
So I would think it natural that when having a single dog in your home, the dog has his social pack needs met by being with humans. It would be part of his genetic make up to accept humans as members of his pack. A single wolf on the other hand would not have those social needs met by humans because they would instintively fear the humans. The wolf pup wouldn’t feel part of a human pack. So the single wolf would likely feel isolated and alone.
And I do agree with the others, that trying to keep a wolf on your property as a pet is a bad idea. Probably illegal as well.
If the OP is serious about starting a wolf sanctuary, he/she can do research, find other wolf organizations, and network with them to find out what would be involved. There may even be some other groups like the one in Russia that is carefully trying to breed wolf-dog hybrids to meet certain needs. The show did make it clear that these were to be working dogs not family pets though.
I couldn’t find a link on the show I watched, but this one might be a good starting place: Russian police employ wolves for service