There is no chance he will be defeated in November. That’s why he can afford to be so cocky.
And, as I also said, this is not even the most liberal congressional district in California. It’s pretty run-of-the-mill, actually. It’s just that there are huge numbers of people here that simply won’t vote Republican under any circumstances.
Wow. I really am surprised that a congressman would take the tone with people. He’s answerable to the people. What a dick. And I’d feel the same way if the shoe was on the other foot and a Rep. rep was treating people questioning him, say, on abortion.
I’m also quite surprised that many of the liberal posters here seem to think his performance is fine. another “wow”.
Hey, if a Republican congressman got all snarky with some idiot who said power to the people and that we should do away with corporations, I’d be all for it. And, as mentioned, politically speaking he’ll get a lot more votes making fun of a Minuteman than being polite to him. Stark doesn’t suffer fools gladly - I’m glad someone doesn’t.
The Minutemen are no different than the KKK or Christian Identity. Any Congressman who actually treats any of those groups politely loses my vote. Not that it matters, since I’m not in Stark’s district, but still…
“People” /= “The People”. He’s answerable to the aggregate of all the people in his district, and less directly to the aggregate of the nation’s people. Not to every single individual, and especially not to the nutcases whose own actions and statements leading to Stark’s comments are pointedly missing.
A rep’s responsibility to The People certainly requires dismissing and even disparaging some people. Perhaps a moment’s contemplation would make you realize that, too.
How about “Our borders are as secure as we can get them without turning the entire thing from the Pacific to the Gulf of Mexico into a new Maginot Line”?
Sounds like someone’s office needs a visit from an intrepid documentarian … maybe someone from WND or Breitbart perhaps? Dressed and ready to go to a costume party later? Any volunteers? We’re waiting tap … tap … tap …
I’m aware that many people don’t like it and think that it’s a derogatory term. Nonetheless, as the m-w.com entry shows, it’s been used as a noun since at least 1939.
I personally think the hyperbolic indignation over its use is a semantic red herring that does no particular favors for illegal immigrants or their advocates. Of the many problems to be solved regarding immigrants and how they’re treated, the favored choice of noun ranks near the bottom of the list---- but being low-hanging fruit, makes a convenient (if not especially constructive) target.