I found a 1952 Pocket Paperback of Philip Wylie’s Opus 21 (1949) in my mother’s closet, and am enjoying the hell out of it–what a bitter, dark, funny sonofabitch the guy was!
I can’t find much of anything about him online, other than bibliographies. No biographical material (except “1902-1971”), no critiques of his work. Any Wylie fans here? Any recommendations of other books of his?
I’m only on page 61 of Opus 21, so please, no spoilers!
I’ve read a few of his books (the two Worlds book, his Gladiator and his final book, The End of The Dream. You’re right, he’s a wonderfully pessimistic author. (Opus 21 and a few others are also on my “to read” list.
I read these two books in high school (1977-1981) about a dozen times. About five years after I graduated I saw the librarian from the school. She mentioned the school was getting rid of a bunch of old and/or outdated books and remembered seeing my name on the checkout card of this book (it was a 1960 edition w/both volumes in one book) and asked me if I wanted it.
It’s a bit worn and the cover had suffered quite a bit of insect damge and there’s some writing on a few of the pages, but it now sits on my bookshelf.
There was talk of doing an updated version of the George Pal movie, but I haven’t heard anything lately.
Tell us how it is when you finally get around to it! As a comic book fan, I’ve always been curious about the book, and I’ve never found a cheap enough copy to buy.
The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction has a decent article on him.
He’s not forgotten among science-fiction fans: Gladiator and When Worlds Collide are two minor classics (ok, Gladiator isn’t a classic…but it’s still good from what I remember from 20-some years ago.)
He also did a dreadful piece of turgid schlock called The Disappearance about a world where all the women suddenly vanish to one dimension and the men to another. The SF Encyclopedia likes it quite a lot as the editors think it “ingeniously assaults the double standard”, which, given the dubious tastes of the editors (hint: even if it agrees with your pet agendas, it can still be bad) means that my (20-some year old) memory of the book is probably correct that it was ham-handed, didactic and shrill.
I’ve got another couple of books by him: Tomorrow! and Triumph, neither of which I remember anything about. If anyone cares, I can dig 'em up and give a brief back cover synopsis for each.
His most famous piece of nonfiction, Generation of Vipers, is still in print. It’s pretty vicious, too. I even think I read it umpty-ump years ago, not long after reading When Worlds Collide and After Worlds Collide. Do a search on the major online booksellers’ websites for Generation of Vipers and you’ll find some information about it.
It’s pretty dern good, actually. And you should be able to find a copy with relative ease–Bison Books recently reprinted it. If you look at the first appearance of Superman, you can clearly see where they’re ripping off Gladiator.
The protagonist is delightfully human and amoral rather than being the hero that Superman is–he shacks up with prostitutes, wreaks havoc on the battlefields but doesn’t go after the enemy leaders, uses his strength to cheat at football…
I remember reading two separate stories in one, I think it was called The Disappearance, in which, in the first story, all males in the world disappear and in the second, all the women. The stories were quaint amd sexist and seemed absurd because it skirted over the issue of homosexuality.
In the 80s DC put out a title called “The Young All-Stars” which had a character called Arn “Iron” Munro. The creators used Gladiator as the possible origin for Iron Munro’s father. The creator of the YAS had this odd theory about how, with various and sundry Golden Age DC heroes ret-conned out of existence in the Crisis, the “super hero energy” that would otherwise have gone into creating those heroes went elsewhere. “Iron” Munro was his idea for a “displaced energy” Golden Age Superman, and IIRC the Gladiator origin story was used as a nod to the idea that Gladiator was a pre-cursor/inspiration for Superman.
Sorry, I’ll stop geeking now. Enjoy the book, Eve.
I’m not into sci-fi, but I might give When Worlds Collide a try. I’ll check the NYPL for any Wylies. I’d prefer his hard-boiled social novels, I think.
I’m surprised he skirted over homosexuality in The Disappearances, as it’s already come up in Opus 27, and he makes it quite clear (in 1949!) that he considers it a quite natural variation of sexuality.
Yeah, Snake-Hips, I always get Joe E. Brown and Russell Crowe mixed up, too . . . can see how they’d be right for the same roles . . . Russell Crowe to Jack Lemmon: “Naobody’s Pehfect!”
I’m surprised that no one’s mentioned his biggest mainstream success – Generation of Vipers. It always gets trotted out for bios and such.
I’ve read Gladiator. It’s pretty good, and I’ve no doubt that it was one of the bases for Superman. (Siegel or Schuster even did a pre-Superman review of it in their SF 'zine when they were kids) Jim Steranko argues persuasively that it was one of the sources in his History of Comics. A copy of the book is on the old Nite-Owl’s bookcase in The Watchmen.
When Worlds Collide was good, too (a lot better than the stupid movie George Pal made of it), but the sequel was stupid.
George Pal was actually trying to get The Disappearance made into a film at the time he died. The magazine cinefantastique printed some of the pre-production sketches, which were incredibly risque. I’ve glanced through the book, but wasn’t impressed enough to actually buy it.
I read The Disappearance. I think Fenris’ take on it is pretty fair – it’s not the best novel I ever read. The issue of homosexuality does indeed come up in the book, and his attitude is probably pretty advanced for his day, but it looks positively Neanderthal from today’s viewpoint.
It’s an essay. A rant. It’s been a long time, and I don’t really recall. . As the reviewers always said, it introduced the concept of “Momism”, which must have been a long better known in the early 1950s than now. Wylie saw mothers as a suffocating bunch, yet adored by their soldier sons.
Yup. But they changed Wylie and Balmer’s “Bronson Alpha” to the science fictiony-sounding “Zyra” for no good reason, they built the takeoff ramp with absolutely no knowledge of physics, and the closing shot is a Chesley Bonestell painting that is easily the worst thing he’d ever done. (It’s hard to make a great space artist like Bonestell look bad)> Arthur C. Clarke wrote a review that’s been reprinted in a few places (and is probably on the 'net) poinrting out the films many failings. The film does have its good points – Robert Bloch said it was one of the few SF films of the 1950s that really was sf and not horror or fantasy. But I find it a disappointment.