Photographers: Tips on shooting the Northern Lights?

In a few weeks I will be in Norway, hoping to see the Northern Lights.

I will be using my Samsung Galaxy S21 phone. (I have a DLSR, Canon 80D, but have decided on my last several trips that my phone does about as well for my vacation snapshooting, and is vastly more convenient.)

I have a lightweight tripod that is small enough to be convenient for travel and just sturdy enough to serve (I hope), and have read a number of web sites that talk about time exposure, etc.

Any other suggestions?

Thanks.

My wife and I spent a week in Tromsø at Christmas a few years ago, specifically to see the lights. I did take a DSLR camera. I found that the most beneficial preparation was to go out into my backyard and practice shooting just the stars. (We were scheduled to be in Norway during a new moon, so I waited until a new moon here to shoot the tests.) By experimenting a little bit and bracketing the settings, I came up with a good combination of aperture, speed, and ISO settings. (Again, I was using a DSLR and a couple different lenses.)

I settled for practice shots that made the sky look like an overcast day, but the stars were not blurred. Took me a couple hours of fooling around.

I also had the advantage of being able to control the camera with a tablet and a camera app, so experimenting, even while I was in Norway and out in chilly weather, was very easy. Didn’t have to remove the camera from the tripod or even touch it (except to orient the tripod head).

With a phone’s tiny lens, can you even let in enough light in a “short-enough” long exposure to show the aurora, but without risking star trails?

I gave up my DSLR too, but I only ever shot in daylight. I’d have thought auroras (and night sky photography in general) would be one of the few places a bigger lens & sensor still excels at relative to phones… but maybe phone cameras have gotten so much better in the last few years that even that’s easy for them now?

On the S21, use the Night setting.

Also, scan around the sky with your camera to spot the aurora, which may look like whispy white clouds to the naked eye.

If it were me, I’d bring the DSLR.
But, if you don’t want to do that, I would look at third-party apps that are designed for night sky photography. I have an iPhone, but I assume that Android is similar - there are probably apps out there that are designed for astrophotography.

When I saw my first Aurora (from southern Colorado!) this spring, I used one of my DSLRs with ISO 1600 and a 16-second exposure (with a very fast lens). I would think that the Aurora will be much brighter where you are going.

That’s amazing! I didn’t know you could see them from Colorado too.

Only very rarely - a few times a century.

Look at this photo. It is a pretty lousy photo, but it was made with a pretty lousy camera for low light conditions. But it still captured a very faint aurora (in South Carolina) in a 1/6th second exposure. With a better camera (like your Galaxy has) and brighter aurora (which your location should have) I’m guessing that you wouldn’t need to crack 1 second for the exposure.

What I kick myself for is not taking a large number of the shots a second or so apart to make a time-lapse video of the aurora as it shifts (as low quality as that would be). If I were you having the chance to do it again I’d try a few shots to see what a good shutter time is, then leave the camera be to do a long timelapse video.

(ETA, I should be aiming that comment at commasense.)

This is the correct answer.

It’s cool that the phone can capture the aurora at all. But if it were me, and I already had a DSLR, I think seeing that photo quality would just make me think “OK, I should bring the DSLR after all.”

Even if the Samsung could capture 2x as more light, that’s not really enough to make a drastic improvement, vs say the DSLR shot that beowulff shared. A casual search for other cell phone aurora pics online shows similar results… grainy, poor dynamic range, poor color. Sure, it gets the point across that “there was an aurora happening and I was there”, but they all look pretty disappointing for anyone used to DSLR photo quality (which is not something I think about, say, cell phone photos shot in daylight).

Modern cell phones can work a lot of magic by compositing detail from several frames in software, and using AI to fill in the blanks and denoise and such, but it’s hard to make up for the sheer difference in glass quality and sensor size between a SLR and a camera. Even APS sensors are huge compared to what phones have, and full-frame ones are much larger than that.

Just IMHO.

Thanks all, for the advice and suggestions.

First of all, I’m not going to take the DSLR, unless one of you kind folks wants to come along (at your own expense, of course) and carry all the gear for me.* The Canon is at least 10x heavier and bulkier than my phone, not counting at least one extra lens, batteries and charger, etc. etc., and would also require my full-size tripod. Not gonna happen. We’re already traveling heavy because of all the winter clothes needed. And anyway, I’m not shooting for National Geographic.

If the Northern Lights were happening in my backyard, I’d use the 80D. Traveling to Norway to see them, I’m using the camera that will be in my pocket anyway, and the small lightweight tripod I’ve just bought for the purpose.

So, following @ZonexandScout’s excellent advice, I went out last night to do some tests, and will probably try a few more before leaving in a couple of weeks. It seems that the S21’s Night feature works pretty well.

Here’s the first shot I took, looking northeast out at Marblehead, MA. The bright object at the very top of the frame to the right is Mars. Exposure details: ƒ/1.8, 1/2 sec, 5.4mm, ISO4000
Google Photos

I tilted up a little to capture Mars and Saturn and got this one. (Mars in the center, Saturn to the upper right.)
Google Photos

Yes, there’s some color banding that I’ll have to try to mitigate (any suggestions?), but for a start, I’m reasonably satisfied.

I spent ten minutes trying a time lapse, and I’m more pleased with that. Samsung’s time lapse feature only lets you set the duration, not frame exposure, so I don’t know what those details are. A few minutes in, I decided to tilt up to get more of the sky, including Mars. At the very end of the 40-second sequence, a plane flies through. (I was going to post it, but when I did, Google Photos revealed my real name. I’ll look for another way.)

Next step is to look for some third-party apps.

Once again, thanks for the advice. Keep it coming.

*That would make at least three Dopers on this Viking cruise. When I happened to mention to someone here that I was going, they got interested and decided to go, too. So next month I’ll have my first IRL meeting with another Doper in about 20 years. (I’m protecting the person’s identity until/unless they decide to disclose it.)

It the very least, you should get one of those octopus tripods.

One option to consider is not making a “time lapse video” using that feature but a sequence of individual full photos. Set the exposure time and everything else you want, then have the camera take a new photo every x seconds. Say, a half-second exposure, one photo per second. Then you import the whole sequence of photos as frames in a video editing app.

Never mind.

I think the exact opposite, if they were in my backyard, meh. no big deal, I’ll use my phone but to spend lots of money to go somewhere far away & exotic, you absolutely bet I’m taking my best camera.

Next time you go out in your backyard, take photos with both your phone & your camera & see how much better they are on the camera.

You may even be able to get away with that lightweight tripod but I would look into some type of remote shutter release so there’s no shake. Depending upon your camera, that may even be a phone app (I don’t know Canon’s line that well). B&H has a basic Vello one for $7.95. I believe I have that exact model at home, though it doesn’t work, I think the battery needs to be replaced as it’s old & not the only one that I have. It’s fine for shots when you’re close to the camera; adjust all of your settings, then press the remote & there’s no camera shake. Get something better if you want to do selfies/groupies when you’re more than a couple of feet from the camera, though. Get a Vello ShutterBoss II for $49.95 & it has all of the intervolemeter functions in the (wired) remote. Peanuts in the overall cost of your trip.

I’ve shot auroras in Iceland and Norway, and will be traveling to Alaska in a while to photograph them. If you decide your 80D is the way to go, I’m happy to post some non-phone tips.

You never know, I may change my mind. Please go ahead.

First of all, some of this may seem rudimentary; I don’t mean to insult anybody’s intelligence, I just don’t know what your skill level is going in so I’m including some basics.

Second, my bona fides: I’ve been doing nature photography for years, and doing a lot of nightscape photography for 5 or 6 years. I’ve had the opportunity to shoot the northern lights on two trips, one to Iceland and one to Lofoten, Norway. I’ll be going to Alaska in March to shoot them again. Here are a couple of samples.

Imgur
Imgur

Gear

Tripod: Use a sturdy tripod, either carbon fiber or aluminum. I prefer a tripod without center column because raising the column makes the whole thing much less stable. You’ll be doing relatively long exposures, so you want as much stability as possible.

If you use an aluminum tripod, I highly recommend you purchase some cheap pipe insulation from Home Depot and duct-tape it to the upper section of one of your trips legs. Aluminum will suck the heat out of your hand like nobody’s business. (https://www.homedepot.com/p/Everbilt-3-4-in-x-6-ft-Foam-Semi-Slit-Pipe-Insulation-K7PXE048078HD1/327682713)

Lens: Use a wide, fast lens. By wide, I’d recommend something in the 15mm to 24mm range. By fast, I mean a lens with a minimum f-stop of 2.8 or smaller. You’ll be doing everything manually, so don’t worry about image stabilization or anything else fancy. There are some really good, relatively cheap, third-party fully-manual lenses that are great for astrophotography. My main astro lens is a Rokinon 24mm 1.4 (https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/819786-REG/Rokinon_24mm_f_1_4_ED_AS.html). If you don’t want to buy a lens, I’ve had good luck renting from Aperturent.com and LensRentals.com.

Remote Shutter Release: I’m partial to a wired remote release, but you can also use apps on your phone. Canon’s app is called “Canon Camera Connect” and is available for Android and iPhone. If you don’t to do either of these, use the 2-second delay feature on your camera’s shutter release setup. This will allow the camera to stop shaking after you press the shutter release before it takes the picture.

Technique

Shoot RAW: Shoot in RAW format. This will give you the greatest flexibility in post processing.

Shoot in Manual Mode: This will to allow you to completely control the exposure. I haven’t had much luck shooting in Aperture or Shutter Priority mode.

White Balance: Set your white balance to somewhere in the 3500-5500K range. If you’re shooting RAW, you can adjust this in post, but I like to get it close in-camera so things look right on the LCD screen when I’m reviewing my shots.

LCD brightness: Turn down the brightness of your LCD. Once your eyes get adjusted to the dark and you start reviewing your shots after you take them, if your LCD is at normal daytime brightness everything will look very bright on the screen. You can actually get fooled into under exposing images this way. So if it’s set to 6 or 7 during the day, turn it down to 2 or 3 at night.

Manually focus: If you’re using a zoom lens, set your zoom to where you want it for your composition. Then, point your camera at a bright star. On your LCD screen on the back of the camera (use live-view if you’re not using a mirrorless camera), magnify that star as much as possible (15x if your camera supports it). DO NOT ZOOM the lens, just magnify the image on the LCD. Now turn your focus ring until the star on the LCD is as small and sharp as possible. Don’t depend on the infinity marker on the zoom ring; your actual focus point will probably be near that but not on it. If you want, once you have focus set, you can tape your zoom ring in place using gaffer’s tape to prevent bumping it.

If you change the zoom level at any point, you should refocus your lens.

Also refocus during your shooting session, just to be sure.

Settings: This is going to depend quite a bit on the auroras and on the camera; you’ll need to play with it a bit to get the correct exposure.

Open up the aperture on the lens as wide as it will go; if your lens is a 2.8 lens, set it to 2.8. Go to a smaller f-stop if you can. If you’re using a fully-manual lens, this will involve turning a ring on the lens itself.

If the auroras you’re seeing are very active and moving quite a bit, you’ll want to use a relatively short exposure, between 1-5 seconds. If they’re relatively static, you can go up to 15 seconds or more. For the active ones, you want to use the shorter exposure to capture the detail; longer exposures will cause them to blur and smooth out, just like shooting a waterfall.

Use your camera’s ISO setting to control the exposure. Assuming you’re shooting in RAW and have access to noise reduction software (either Lightroom or something like Topaz DeNoise), don’t be afraid to go high on the ISO. I’ve shot auroras successfully at ISO 12800 (on a Canon R5). This works fine for shots with JUST the auroras. If you have a foreground element, I’d recommend you don’t go higher than ISO 6400. But remember, the lower ISO, the lower the noise in the image, so keep it as low as you can and still get a properly exposed shot.

Test Shots: Take a lot of test shots. Digital shots are free; take time to set your composition the way you want, using test shots and reviewing them to make sure your horizon is level, there’s nothing weird jutting into the frame edges, etc.

Composition: Personally, I prefer almost all of my nightscape shots to have some sort of foreground element. Whether it’s shooting the Milky Way or the Northern Lights, I prefer them to be a secondary – although interesting – addition to the shot, not the primary focus. That said, there are some great abstract shots of just the auroras to be had and I enjoy those, too.

Post-processing: Assuming you’re using Lightroom, take advantage of its noise reduction feature. This works really well with auroras. Also, boost the clarity of your aurora using a local selection of the sky.

Practice: Familiarize yourself with all these settings and functions at home, in the dark, before you go on your trip. There’s nothing worse then fumbling around in the cold dark snow trying to figure out how to do these things, and potentially missing a shot.

Red lights: Leave red lights at home. Yes, they help you maintain your night vision, but if you get red light polluting your shot, it’s virtually impossible to get it out.

Enjoy the night: This is important: Get out from behind the camera and take some time to just enjoy the amazing spectacle of what you’re seeing.

This is fantastic advice, @Turek! Thanks. I will try out the DLSR on my new light tripod and see if it’s feasible, and then will consider taking the big camera. At the very least, quite a bit of this advice can be applied to my phone.

Much appreciated!

No problem, I enjoyed writing it up. Please reach out if you have any questions.