Once again, I have a bone to pick with Cecil’s answers, old though they may be. Last week, it was his endorsement of vinegar as a solution to cat-spray odor, which really does not work. Now it’s pigeons
I don’t think Cecil offers the primary reason that pigeons adapt well to an urban environment. That hundreds of generations ago their pigeon grandparents were fed out of a trough hardly seems adequate explanation.
What are the four species of birds most likely to be found living in an urban setting? Worldwide, I think, but certainly in North America? Pigeons, starlings, English sparrows, and crows. What do these four species have in common? They flock. They’re societal, garrulous birds who have followed the safety-in-numbers evolutionary route. It’s my theory, based on 30-odd years of birdwatching and reading of evolution and animal-behavior books, that this is the key factor in their ability to live among humans.
Consider: the birds who claim and guard their territory—the solitary songbirds, who sing to warn others away—are never found living in an urban setting. Their whole existence is one of defended solitude. Flocking birds, however—who use their song to communicate within their group; to stay together—these are the birds who’ve moved into the cities. Their whole existence, of course, is urban crowding in microcosm. They’re used to jostling shoulders with other birds, squabbling over food, etc. The crowded urban setting is just an extension—an exaggeration—of that.
And no, I don’t have cites, but I feel pretty confident in the logic, and I have a great deal of non-professional and professional experience of birds, and a lifetime of being a science-book-worm.
Any one care to comment, one way or the other?