Part of the problem is that a supposed victims’ group called DogsBite.org in only interested in bites by anything that remotely resembles a Pit Bull.
Not bit by a Pit? Doesn’t count.
Surviving member of a Pit-owning family? No sympathy for you! You’re just another nutter to them.
There’s that reading comprehension problem again.
From the link:
If I was a passenger in your car, and suddenly, without provocation, jumped on you, causing you to loose control of your car, leading to a fiery crash, that would constitute an attack, no?
Trivial nutter PBS (PitBullShit)
BTW - it was a Facebook comment by 5 other Facebook persons. Lynn never used the word “attack” in your link provided- she did agree with FB Jeff Sloan who commented that there were two unrelated cases where pit bulls attacked their owner / driver causing crashes.
I see.
So it is acceptable, in Nutterville, for a pit bull to maul a jogger, causing 2 broken bones that required titanium and stainless steel rods and months of recovery?
Got it.
Those damn jogging victims. Those are who we need to ban.
Pit Bull Shit.
I have seen the X-rays. So did the court.
No, not an “attack” but simply an animal jumping on a driver of a vehicle traveling at highway speed.
:rolleyes:
Sure you did. You’re an expert on X-rays now?
What court? Wasn’t it settled out of court?
So a bite and immediate release followed by a second bite and immediate release is “mauling” now? And just how did one break suddenly become two?
“2 other cases”, the operative word being “other”, meaning that the guy believes this was a third and Lynn agreed. Ergo, she also believes it was an attack.
:taking bets on what cougar comes up with to avoid addressing the points in the last four posts:
OK, for those who haven’t ever seen one, here’s a pitbull fight. NSFW.
Really? Really?
That cites blames the victim, Lynn, because she said she passed the woman and her leashed pit bull, then it attacked her as she jogged by?
Google Youtube videos of pit bull pulling car. And try to comprehend that a pit on a leash can jump and maul you, after you have passed it. The pit may have been behind, or even, with its owner, on its leash. Or it could have pulled its owner.
Look at the photo - zoom in - you can see the pit bulls puncture wounds around the area of the compound fracture
http://www.dogsbitedecatural.com/2011/02/decatur-al-victim-colleen-lynn-founder.html
Nutters: “but it could have been from her fall”
Hilarious
So who had “argumentum ad infinitum”? 
Here is the police report of Colleen Lynns attack:
http://legal.pblnn.com/images/lynn/lynnseattlerecords.pdf
And nutters blame the victim?
Note that this is from a pro pit bull site, - and once again, they block out the name of the pit owner.
FYI the pit owners name : “Qdeene Nagasawa”
Not true (AKA Liar):
Huskies, German Shepherd , Rotts - they are all included.
And here is her original statment to Seattle Animal Control:
No mention of her passing or stopping as in the police report.
No mention of the walker losing her grip on the leash in either report, not until nearly three years after the fact:
As noted earlier, a real dog bite expert declared that there were no dragging nor shaking injuries to her arm. She continually embellishes her story and we’re supposed to believe her story that the dog caused a (as in one, not two) fracture in her arm? :dubious:
I was referring to the victims’ group itself, not the website.
cite for the “real dog expert” that “declared that there were no dragging nor shaking injuries to her arm” ?
