grienspace, you weren’t paying attention, and you fucked up. Live with it.
Remember the old analogy about wrestling in the mud with a pig? It applies.
Huh. If you wanna play hardball, that email probably won’t even be considered an offer to which you can agree, but an invitation to treat. The words “good news”, “can subscribe”, “why not do so now” all point to an invitation to treat, not an offer. There may even be a disclaimer at the bottom saying words to that effect, but I don’t have the email. “Excuse the spam” also implies that it’s an advertisement.
This is especially so since you don’t subscribe by replying to that email, but instead go though another agreement process, where you expressly agree to terms and conditions.
This thread isn’t the place to get legal advice, though. If you want to, open a GQ. At least more lawyers will see it there, and perhaps respond.
:eek: :dubious: 
It has nothing to do with rules dear. I’ve got rules as well. One of them is “don’t fuck with me”. I’m pretty sure that I’ve posted a reference to that rule many times. Haven’t you read that? should you even be conversing with me without respecting my rule?
Nevermind, suffice it to say thay my contribution to a contract offer is as valid and valuable to the offer made to me (when accepted ) and any other conditions subsequently attached or made generally requiring an effort on my part to access do not apply morally or legally.
In case of any doubt.
Was your “contract” notarized?
Thankyou. I rest my case.
That sounds hauntingly similar to a Republican campain slogan.
Not neccessary.
‘G’ omitted on purpose
Err… what? Did you exchange emails with Zotti? No?
You subscribed through the SDMB website, and if I remember correctly the contract terms don’t even state the 50% reduction (just checked, it doesn’t)
I fail to understand what’s going on in your head. In case you didn’t notice, I’ll post it again.
The email is not an offer. It doesn’t matter what the email says. Even if the email was an offer, you did not subscribe by replying to it, therefore it does not bind as a contract.
Yeah, I’m getting that piggy feeling.
Oh yeah, and if you can, please tell me how my cite helps your case. I’m genuinely curious.
Jesus, grienspace , are you still whining?
I thought you were bowing out of this thread. How come you are so invested in my pitting? Are you secretly Mrs Zotti ?
Obviously people are still listening !
It is your cite, so you tell me how it supports your position first. I have a response ready for you afterwards.
(The last statement is subject to all the rules and regulations set forth in all the posts submitted by the moderators and administrators of the SDMB since the year 2000.
Oh, give me a fucking break. What are you, twelve?
No, we’re just sitting here laughing our asses off at you. 
grienspace,
Do yourself a favor and step away from the keyboard. You are making an ass out of yourself. I don’t know (or care) who your actually mad at but taking it out on ED is stupid. You HAVE to be intentionally acting obtuse here as your silly semantics arguement has been shown over and over to be Bullshit.
Please, do the world a favor and grow up.
Unclviny