He has an equally idiotic misconception of language, that words have no objective meaning, that they mean nothing more nor less than the subjective intent of the specific speaker. What derives from that obviously stupid premise are a whole lot of stupid but stubborn conclusions that mean any engagement with him in any language thread (whether theoretical, or related to SDMB policy) is invariably confusing and counterproductive.
But it’s notable that both his legalistic view of morality expressed here and his stupid misconception of the nature of language converge on a conclusion that racism is okay.
Fighting misogyny - but "cunt" and "bitch" are still okay words - #114 by Max_S
(second half of the post, in response to @Irishman’s question)