Pitting Uzi's useless claim about the SDMB being an echo chamber

I know several true conservatives, some of whom I call friends, and none of them have ever expressed any interest in torturing or murdering anyone (other than child molesters and the occasional DMV employee). Nor have any of them ever expressed, either overtly or via their actions, a “rabid hatred for the majority of humanity.” They do seem to have a uniform desire for law and order, fiscal responsibility, and tend to favor the status quo vs. change.

“Law and order” means “persecute anyone who isn’t a rich white Christian male”. “Fiscal responsibility” means “give money to the rich and loot everyone else”. And the name for people who prefer the status quo is “liberal”, conservatives want radical change (for the worse).

We have different definitions; I don’t personally know anyone who subscribes to yours.

This is clearly bullshit when you won’t specifically name those issues because you know you will get your ass handed to you if you do. “Keep it vague and bitch a lot” seems to be the rule for the whiners, it seems.

I consider myself to be middle, of the left end of the spectrum.
I often see posters to the left of me, never mind conservatives, get crucified on this board.
So I mostly give political post a wide hearth.
And it appears to me this pitting, is mainly to ensure this sort of self policing stays firmly in place.
In regards to politics, this board is the best insulated echo chamber I have ever encountered.
Granted I stay away from the far right one.

Well, bully for you, that was just one poster that noted also why is that other boards, and specially the right wing ones, are an echo chamber. Her point was that: that the usual banning for posting evidence or opinions in those boards is not really taking place on this one. YMMV. But I do encounter many (former?) conservatives in the SDMB that look at the evidence and are convinced of how unhinged the current Republican leadeship and many rich people are nowadays.

Call me crazy, but I don’t exactly take the posts from a poster self named “Culling The Herd” as sincerely attempting to join a community.

Ha, that’s funny. Thanks for that.

Could ya at least attempt to be subtle about what kind of troll you are Mr./Ms. Sealion?

You think it’s an echo chamber because conservative views are argued against? What would it need to be not an echo chamber? Exact 50-50 split? Conservative views are not criticized?

Yes, conservatives are outnumbered here. But you still get to share your views (with the exception of your personal bug-up-your ass on the definition of gender). Echo chambers are where opposing views are not allowed, not where they are criticized. Deal with it, snowflake.

Accusations of trolling . Do not accuse posters of being trolls or trolling.

Report me if you think I’m someone I’m not. I have no idea who this sealion person is.

Since you’ve finally started you might want to read all the rules.
Also, troll not sock . . . but thanks for the tell.

Sure you don’t.

Now I REALLY don’t know what you’re talking about, but as long as you’re amusing yourself. I’ve no problem with it, but I do hope you report me if you think I’m impersonating someone.

I’m not, to quote you, “a Soros backed prosecutor”.

:sigh:

Impersonating someone is being a “sock”. Trolling is to purposely get another poster to react just for the enjoyment of the Troll. Hence my observation when you admitted to @Ann_Hedonia that: “I think I’ll stay, thanks, if for no better reason than that it seems like it would mildly irritate you.”

I suggest you go back and you’ll find that was NOT my quote. That came from another poster.

But thanks for the explanation of what a sock is. Ya learn something new every day.

Got confused by the icon color, in any case, you do agree then that what @WalterBishop said then was not “Well said” as you told him, no?

Also, learn how to use the quote function if the text of that post wasn’t directed at me.

What if someone signed up as Sealion?