Note: This is from Would I Lie To You?, a game where the celebrities read a card and the other team guesses if the statement is true or a lie.
However, the part my brain is having a hard time understanding is the opening 45 seconds to a minute. Everything after the opening minute is irrelevant to this question.
Lee, the card reader, says that the man was “2/3 the way up the tree.” When asked how tall the tree was, he responds, “As high as the man was up, plus 1/3.”
David(on the other team) points out that the man must have been 3/4 the way up the tree, then. He says, “If he was 2/3 the way up the tree, then the height of the tree was how high he was up, plus a half.”
Hey, I guess I’m ignorant because I can not process the information in the exchange they have. I would have understood it as Lee said it. He was 2/3 the way up the tree, there for that height plus the remaining 1/3 is the height of the tree.
What the heck is David critiquing? Everyone kind of claps and acknowledges his point, but I can’t get it through my mind.
Can anyone here explain or illustrate?