I get to vote every now and then, and it has proved to be a rather unsatisfying experience. In my district, the rep is actually a kind of decent guy, but he belongs to the party full of crazies, so he ends up standing in support of them. At the same time, the people on the far side of the state are irked that both the Senators for the state are not in their corner.
This past week, there was an election in Alberta and one in Britain that showed results that were a bit unbalanced for the electorate. Governments that will be in power probably through most of the rest of this decade.
As I understand it, in England they have bookmakers who lay odds on elections and, I guess, take bets and pay winners. Which seems pretty appropriate, as elections all around have the appearance of little more than a basketball game or cricket test match. It feels as though the powers that be are just entertaining us so that we fail to notice the sodomy as much.
In the US, there are a number of wackadoodle extremist groups that sometimes become violent, or at least troublesome, and I get the sense that a good part of their discontent arises from feeling shut out of the process. While I would not enjoy having wackadoodle-type policy ensconced in the civil code, it seems likely those people may have some valid and useful contributions to make in other areas where they have real expertise or wisdom. And including them in the process would almost certainly moderate their discontentment.
The concept I put forth here is clearly not immune to being corrupted, I would not argue on that point (independent oversight would be a necessity). But it does seem like it would be a little less sensitive to the negative influence of big money, as well as (in this description) more dynamic over time. Therewith,
Proxy
Each qualified citizen has one vote to exercise in the House of (Whatever). Since the vast majority lack the time to devote to this, citizens shall have the right to delegate their vote to a representative.
The opportunity to assign, reassign or retract a vote comes at a regular interval, every four months, at the option of the individual (i.e., filing is on set dates, if the person chooses to make a change at that time), but each individual must wait at least twelve months between making a change.
When a tally of collected votes is made, in order to assess the weight of each representative’s voting power, no representative is entitled to wield more than 1.25% of the total for the House, and no representative may be barred without just cause if they hold at least 0.35%. The minimum quorum must be 80 representatives, the maximum 300.
Each representative may retain delegated voting power for three full years from the time of their initial assessment; upon completion of this term, all delegated votes must be released to the voters who provided them, and that representative is enjoined from collecting votes for one year. Any single vote may only pass between a representative and the citizen whose vote it rightfully is.
The house shall make its sessions available to any citizen who holds at least one vote unless just cause can be shown for barring them. A single daily session may not exceed 300 direct participants, so the House shall keep a record of requests and shall honor them in the order received.