I feel stupid asking this. What is the plural of maiden? Is it maiden? Or maidens?
Logically I should just add an “s”, but the word “maidens” just doesn’t sound right.
Could it be… one maiden, two maiden?
I know that when a noun ends in an “s”, the plural is typically the same as the singular form. One corps, two corps. One chassis, two chassis.
And there are all kinds of other irregular ways to form a plural, like one child, two children; one half, two halves; one soliloquy, two soliloquies; one goose, two geese; one focus, two foci; one axis, two axes; etc.
(I checked the dictionary and it provides no guidance so I’m assuming just adding an “s” is correct, but damn, it still doesn’t sound right.)
Sorry, it was a total hijack that occurred to me after writing “a part of your brain”. The phrase comes from a UK satire (“media terrorism”) show called Brass Eye, where they got celebrities to make public service videos criticising a drug that didn’t even exist. One of the celebs was made to say “It targets a structure in the brain known as ‘Shatners Bassoon’ and that’s the part of the brain that deals with time perception”. The name of the organ is so absurd that nobody could believe that he’d actually said it on camera.
Stop it jjimm, you’ve been smoking that cake again haven’t you?
Moose isn’t the only word that is the same in singular and plural, of course, but the others I can think of are all animals - flock of sheep, shoal of fish etc. Fish is one of those where the -es pluralisation is optional (hence “loaves and fishes” is right too).
I’ve heard naturalists getting carried away with this usage and calling any group of animals by the singular form of their name instead of the plural.