Get Ryan Seacrest to host and we can make bank with this.
*Beatific Idol *would be an ironically delicious name for a show.
Get Ryan Seacrest to host and we can make bank with this.
*Beatific Idol *would be an ironically delicious name for a show.
Pope Pius XII is pretty close to being canonized, and, depending on which historians you believe, awfully complicit in helping the Nazis deport Italian Jews.
But not an actual member of a Nazi organization, as the last guy was. Yeah, yeah, “I never wanted to join” is what ALL the ex Hitler Youth guys say. ![]()
That’s a little unfair, not that Ratzinger doesn’t have a lot else to atone for.
This thread could be combined with the Joe Paterno thread.
If there eventually are statues of the two of them, they should have blindfolds.
How about addressing the actual topic rather than your usual deflection.
Now I’m wondering why every single pope is not named a saint. Think about it. God chooses the pope through the cardinals. So it stands to reason only a saintish person would chosen. They must all be saints, eh?
I can see why people have issues with John Paul, but John XXIII? Seriously?
Most popes are kind of boring, aren’t they? I mean, as a liturgically conservative atheist whose main interest in the whole pope thing is the trappings of an absolute monarch, I kind of liked old Benny Foursquare, but I don’t know that he inspired people so much so that they’ll keep rooting for him after his death. The most memorable thing he did was quit, wasn’t it?
Guin, I think “both of them” refers to “JPII and Paterno”. But wouldn’t Paterno be holding the blindfold in his hand and offering it to the viewer?
I’m imagining that there aren’t many people directing intercessory prayers to, say, Alexander VI.
Speak for yourself! ![]()
If you’re not a Roman Catholic what the fuck are you worrying about who gets a sainthood and who doesn’t? It’s meaningless to non-believers. It’s as if I were the head of the Flying Spaghetti Monster cult and having said that some dead guy would be made a Sacred Noodle you wrote indignantly saying he wasn’t worthy of it.
It’s all bullshit, claptrap, superstitious nonsense. No rational person gives a flying fuck about any of it. Just smile indulgently at their silly antics and move on.
Because the rest of us have to live in a world where the RCC is an important sociopolitical force, much more so than any other religious organization of any faith, and this kind of thing reflects on the Church’s general direction.
:smack:
You guys are confusing me again. What’s wrong with simply “having” to preside over a spate of scandals involving the priesthood?
It’s the Disneyfication of the Catholic Church. Pope John Paul II, instead of being examined through the long and careful lens of a few decades of reflection and analysis, is an “Instant Classic!” Saint.
Considering the immense lengths that man went to to protect, cover up, whitewash over, transfer, hide and otherwise deny the legions of collar-toting child rapists in His employ, I kinda was hoping for " Instant Classic! Sinner ", instead of Saint.
Oh well. It doesn’t change what he was or the atrocities he assisted.
–Clucking tongue-- Now, now, we know better.
If being a sinner disqualified you from canonization, there wouldn’t be any saints.