Just backtracking on where this came from, Bone had issued the following instruction back in July:
This injunction is quite understandable. But I have to say I don’t think Will violated it in the thread in question. His comment was relevant to someone suggesting that an ex-president could be quietly silenced by the state. Here’s the prior comment in the thread, then Will’s comment that got him a warning:
So, much as I agree that Will posting repetitively about his hobby horse is a bit tiresome, given that he didn’t have a complete topic ban but an instruction not to post about it when it’s irrelevant, I’m not sure Bone’s warning for WIll making that comment was fair.
Of course, Will’s subsequent petulant reaction to the warning is another matter.