**wolfpup **has it right in post#14. The thread is talking about unauthorized disclosure of classified information. WillFarnaby makes the handoff to “anti-state speech”. This isn’t a thread about anti-state speech. Will also introduces the idea of whistleblowing, but that’s not what the thread is about either. This is compounded by introducing Manning, Snowden, Binney, etc. None of these are related to dementia causing unauthorized disclosure of classified information. This is clearly violative of the previous instructions.
When the instructions were given, WillFarnaby indicated that he had no intention of changing behavior:
That’s not a good recipe for being a member in good standing.
But the thing that pushed this over the line from a warning to a temp suspension pending further discussion is Will’s attempt to take pot shots in response. Previously he referred to me as a kind of token conservative, or a pet of some kind:
Then, in the recent example, similar:
This last one would have received a warning by itself but I suspended him instead.