Poster Warned then Suspended for debating in Great Debates

[Riemann]

@Ravenman

But folks should notice that my post was agreeing with his prior post, in which he was incredulous that the Government would use extra-judicial means to silence a former President. I agreed with that…

Yes, I would have been better to quote Flyer’s prior post, before your comment and before Will said anything:

@Flyer

…Congress has the option of getting involved. They could appropriate money to build a nice, secure, one-occupant nursing home. Whether they would depends on the situation.

So the issue of extra-judicial silencing was introduced by somebody else, and it’s in GD, not GQ. Seems like a pretty subjective call to me to say definitively that Will’s post was irrelevant and ding him straight out with a warning.