Easterbrook’s column is smart, funny, covers a wide range of topics (not all of them related to football) and always features a cheer-babe photo or three. What’s not to like? His political opinions are generally conservative, but not maliciously so.
Oh, I don’t care about his political opinions and while I find his treatment of the cheerleaders creepy and unsettling (we get it, Gregg, you think they’re hot but you’re really interested in their minds but you’re really not, we get it), that’s not the problem, either. The problem is I disagree strongly with both of your first two adjectives. *He *may be smart, but his column is not - it’s intellectually dishonest and lazy - and he may be funny, but his column is not. IMO, and all that.