you don’t really hear “sexual orientation” that much any more - “sexuality” is the more common term.
Maybe it’s just me, but I understood that as an implied distinction between fancying it and actually doing it.
I hadn’t (yet?) come across objections to “orientation” on the grounds that it sounds as though it’s associated with orientalism, but if that’s a problem, I suppose “alignment” could work as an alternative.
A not particularly insightful article relying on the usual exaggerations and sloppy arguments of typical anti-“wokeism” whining, IMHO. I agree, however, that the author did a good job of using rhetorical skill to misrepresent his subject as something “terribly sad”. (“Linguistic purification”, “banning words”, pretending that official corporate-language style guides are somehow threatening the freedom of authors of essays and memoirs, oh boo hoo hoo how tragic, uh-huh.)
Agree that “gender and sexuality” seems to be preferred nowadays as an umbrella term for all social and biological aspects of matters associated in some way with sex (including asexuality), rather than the more narrow issue of which direction one is “oriented” sexually. I likewise haven’t encountered any criticisms of the term “orientation” in the sense of “alignment” or “direction”, as opposed to long-deprecated usages such as “Oriental” or “the Orient”.
My company uses “LGBTQIA+”. I prefer to use “gender-diverse”, as I prefer words over initialisms. The word “gender”, at its root, means “kind” (as in a category). In this connotation of sexual identities it is all inclusive. If particular circumstances refer to a more specific group, then that group should be referred to explicitly.
Cis male
Cis female
Trans male
Trans female
Non-binary
Agender
Gender fluid
Bigender
and maybe intersex, not that that’s really a gender
The others are just variant names. It doesn’t seem outrageous to give people the choice of how to express ideas that don’t have really well-understood meanings in many communities right now.
I’m old enough that I remember queer being used as a slur. This would have been the sixties and seventies so it was later than you recall (or I grew up in a region that was behind on its use of abusive language).
Either way, that’s the usage I grew up with and my personal association with the word. Which is why I’m not comfortable using it.
I was called that pretty often between 4th grade and sophomore yr of high school. Edited to Add: late 60s thru mid 70s [/edit] I’m on board with repurposing mean-spirited words that others called me by. It’s in the spirit of “I am one of the ones singled out and called this thing”. A central part of why I choose to draw attention to my identity is that other people made an issue of it first.
But I recognize that other people (whether called that or just uncomfortable flinging around a word that made others uncomfortable) are not at ease with using it.
Queer was certainly still used as a pejorative well into the 80s, possibly early 90s. It’s used a few times in Stranger Things (set in the 80s), as a slur against Will by some bullies. It still feels odd to me to use that word in a neutral or positive sense, as my childhood associations with it being used in phrases like “you fucking queer” or the childhood game we called “Smear the Queer” is so strong.
It’s like when the lesbian feminists within the National Organization for Women chose to form a group called “Lavender Menace”. It’s what Betty Friedan had called them. It was their way of saying back “we know we’re going to be called the most horrific things you can think of and we don’t care, we ain’t going away and we won’t be shut down by your attempts to smear us”.
Or imagine if Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders formed a new splinter party and named themselves the “Godless Commie Threat”. It really sticks a spike in your opponents’ attempt to get everyone to dismiss you as some intolerable departure from the acceptable.
There are people who identify as intersex. That is, their biology is intersex, and they identify as a gender associated with that biology. There’s a documentary called Intersexion available on Prime Video, and I think the filmmaker so identifies.
I know that there are different meanings for many that you call “just variant names.” Transmasc people include folks who don’t identify as nonbinary, nor as transmen. Genderqueer ealso is distinct, and is not contained within any that you listed. A few of those listed are preferred ways of expressing essentially the same concepts, but many are distinct.
I mean, really, all of these are on a multidimensional continuum, and not really atomic identities. Most of us “round” to an identity that fits us well enough. Having lots of options to self-identify seems like a good thing, not a problem.