FinnAgain:
By shifting the goal posts. The fictional nature of many stories in the Tanakh was used to show that it could not be used as supporting evidence as well as the fact as many religious claims are contained solely within its pages, they were in turn falsified. You then shifted the goalposts to some sort of strange weaksauce apologia for how sure the actual stories are fictional, but… something… you still haven’t actually said why we should give a damn about some ‘just so stories’ even if they’re metaphorical. Or, for that matter, what those stories have to do with the topic of this thread.
You haven’t engaged in anything but goalpost shifting so far. Prove me wrong, show where you address the factual claims made in the Tanakh and/or the Christian Bible and show how they support a religious narrative. If they are (as you seem to be tapdancing around) irrelevant, then admit you were simply shifting the goalposts in order to offer a dodge as an apologia. As for you imagining that someone is angry, you might want to look up the psychological phenomena of projection.
Proving that either you don’t understand what evidence is, or you’re deliberately misusing it to score rhetorical points. No, there is no evidence for a global flood. Quoting a well known site full of lies and half truths, like AiG, shows that you’re not either not interested in factual answers, or unwilling to spend the time and effort required to actually analyze factual claims you stumble upon.
Obviously, even if you have a local flood (which I just said have occurred), that’s not proof of a global magic flood. First of all, even for your claim, the answer is still no . Even if it was accurate, you need to find evidence of a global flood. Do you not understand why, even if there was a massive flood in the Grand Canyon, that doesn’t actually have any bearing on proof for a global flood?
And the problem again is atheists will stubborn refuse to accept any evidence that supports the Bible. Therefore, they boldly claim there is ZERO evidence.
I even went to the effort of looking up the definition of “evidence”
A thing or things helpful in forming a conclusion or judgment
Therefore, I can certainly look to the fact that the flood story exists in many cultures with striking similiarity to the Bible as “evidence” negating your claim that there is ZERO evidence.