Also, sorry the Queen’s lady-in-waiting (with whom she rode in the limousine) didn’t sit with her during the service to provide company and some measure of comfort. She looked so lonely and sad there all by herself.
And odd to see the regimental colors actually resting on the ground as the hearse began its drive. I can understand lowering them, holding them horizontally or dipping them in salute or grief, but not having them touch the ground.
Hats off to Heinlein, but John Varley’s is better (from “Tango Charlie and Foxtrot Romeo”):
Lord guard and guide all those who fly
Through Thy great void above the sky.
Be with them all on ev’ry flight,
In radiant day or darkest night.
Oh, hear our prayer, extend Thy grace
To those in peril deep in space.
In addition to the space versions I have a dim recollection of an aviation version, but I can’t seem to find the lyrics. Does that ring a bell for anyone else?
Wikipedia quotes a version from the Episcopal Church which has an aviation verse:
O Spirit, whom the Father sent
To spread abroad the firmament;
O Wind of heaven, by thy might
Save all who dare the eagle’s flight,
And keep them by thy watchful care
From every peril in the air.
It’s part of ‘Common Worship: prayers and services for the Church of England’, and “Hymns Ancient and Modern”. When the commentator said it was from the Orthodox Church I was expecting Church Greek or Church Russian rather than the standard English service.
“The lowering of flags to the ground in salute goes back to at least the late 16th century, and used to be called “vailing”. On the march, the flag is lowered perpendicular to the body of the ensign (flag bearer). Standing troops lower their flag so that the pike touches the ground, and this is usually done with a flourish so that the flag drapes flat on the ground. The only modern concession the British have made is for the ensign to loosely roll the flag on the pike if the ground is wet in order to minimise soiling.”
This is the normal practice around the world. The US is an exception, possibly the only one.
That’s true for a relative comparison of the two general publics, but I’m pretty sure the reverence for particular flags is much greater in the British military tradition. Any flag paraded in a military ceremony in the USA is just a stock item (AFAIK). It’s not specially designed and embroidered, consecrated, handed over by a VIP in a big ceremony, held for years by a military unit as its very special important object to be guarded and revered, or laid up in a church to be adored forever when it’s retired.
I suppose the banners on the ground could symbolize whatever it represents literally prostrating face-to-ground, as once people would to royalty?
In the U.S. practice, the unit standard dips in salute but still must not touch the ground. Meanwhile the national flag never dips, for anyone or anything, anywhere, not even in someone else’s country.
I watched the ceremony up until the Queen entered the chapel, then I started sobbing and turned it off. (BTW, I’m American). I did not notice the Union Jack on Phillip’s coffin. Did I miss it, or was it not there?
Every military has its traditions - flags obviously date from a time when they were literally used to lead regiments into battle, so they hold a lot of significance. Flags are designed to represent regiments or even to commemorate individual battles.
I was referring to the reverence that the US has for the stars and stripes - it seems, from a distance, that it stands in for a national figurehead, hence the concept that the national flag never dips. I was referring to the fact that for us, that’s the Queen.