Cough, cough!!!
So, if you can’t, don’t know how, or got to a place that the aircraft simply can not fly on one of 2 engines, why would you not take the first available, reasonable, within your skill set, emergency landing spot? Faulty thinking about how it should fly and you do not know the aircraft as well as you should to be PIC is usually the reason you die in style. :smack:
Just pull the plug on the other engine and do your simple aircraft emergency landing. Apparently that seems unacceptable to you all. Don’t know how it reacts to 2 windmilling engines or how it glides with both feathered or any other configuration? Nothing wrong with the airplane. The so called pilot is ::: cough, cough… :::: I thought you guys were/are pilots, not god complex doctors in too much aircraft… :eek:
And still spouting the old small twins can’t fly on one or can’t climb, or will kill you in the mountains, etc. Old wives tales.:rolleyes:
Old Piper Apache with 150hp engines at max weight is a single engine aircraft that needs 2 engines to do much of anything. The pilots made all the mistakes in every crash of those that I ever knew anything about.
Lancer, fixed pitch props. If were smart you never tried to fly with just one producing power. Lancer
And other of that ilk. Yepper, not big preformers.
Had the C-310 turbo I worked in to 31,000 feet. It was snowing inside. Not at max weight of course.
IMO, way too much wrong info being repeated about light twins in the world today…
If flown with malice of forethought, knowledge, skill, and no god complex, it can be just as safe or safer than the multi million dollar single turbo-prop with the safer, more powerful engine.
I do not agree that the type, cost, power or other goodies on board in anyway compensates for bad, insufficient, and stupid thinking which causes so much of the small aircraft accidents.
Come on guys, don’t spout the non-sense. It makes me think you all started as Continental co-pilots…
Bawahahahaha That is so bad. Sorry. he he he