Um, medicine? A doctor encountering a person in danger of life or limb is expected to take such actions as are necessary to ensure survival and any preventable permanent damage without thought of ability to pay, collecting for his services afterwards if such is possible but not expecting it always to be possible.
Building trades? There’s a long history of volunteerism in times of natural disaster.
Religion? Clergy are expected to provide spiritual care to persons needing or wanting it without regard to whether it will garner them additional income. While there may be some strong views on the efficacy of such spiritual care around these parts, acting within the presumption that such care is efficacious, it is their obligation to provide it.
Banking? Until recently it was the custom of most banks to cash official checks on proof of identity, there being no benefit to the bank from this public service.
Police? “A policeman is never off duty.” If he sees a crime or dangerous situation in process, he is to act, even if not at present on the payroll.
These are civic responsibilities willingly shouldered by adult human beings with a degree of empathy towards their fellow man with whom thy share a society. It is unfortunate that your ethical deficiencies keep you from seeing your own professional responsibilities as being on all fours with these. Most lawyers do, in my experience.
Unfortunately, as you note, the sovereign State of Illinois has not seen fit to penalize the sociopaths and shirkers among those whom it admits to the bar – something I believe you have sufficiently brought to public attention that it should soon be corrected.
