Professionals And Their Competency In The Media.

Teaching has rarely been reflected well in movies or television. Serious movies/ television dramas set at colleges almost have it right — but the action is almost invariably centered on the students from a students’ POV and not the teachers, so you rarely see things from an administrative/teaching staff POV. Typically, the younger you get with the grade levels, the more unreal the action is and the behavior of the students.

I ALWAYS have a big laugh/grimace at how early childhood development is portrayed – most movies like “Daddy Day Care”, “Kindergarten Cop”, just have it wrong, wrong, wrong! They always seem to show students as basically well-adjusted but often misguided middle class kids with no personal, behavioral or social problems to overcome that impact the learning environment.

Take the movie “Overboard” with Goldie Hawn, f’rinstance. I like the movie, but the scene with Goldie Hawn telling off the schoolteacher for not noticing her boys had poison oak after they cut up in her classroom all day was only HALF right, and misses the point. (Frankly it was poorly written, cheap-cop out; no child on the planet will sit up in class all day suffering from itchy poison oak and not complain to the teacher, and no right-thinking teacher would allow a kid to suffer with poison oak without medical treatment.) The teacher should have said: “Mrs. Proffitt, with all due respect, didn’t you notice all four of your sons had poison oak and needed medical attention BEFORE you sent them to school this morning?” – which would have reinforced the teacher’s (correct) point that MOST of the cutting up in school stemmed from poor parenting and disciplinary changes that needed to be made/reinforced at home.

Oh, and that rant against tests pigeonholing children was just stupid. Are there really people who feel that way?

I’m a prison guard. There was this one time in a movie … no wait, that was every movie and television show ever made which had a prison guard in it.

What, Little Nemo, you and your colleagues don’t devote your days to sadistically breaking the wills of the noble band of brothers behind bars?

I hear the geologists are cackling loudly over the upcoming “10.5” TV movie, and from one of the ads I saw, it’s not hard to see why.

At one point in the jump-cuts, you see some technician sort rattling around in his chair from the shaking reading off increasing numbers: “7.5…7.8…8.4…9.2!!” or something to that effect, as though the Richter scale was a dial in front of his workstation, which apparently the taxpayers are shelling out salary for him to sit in front of all day long, everyday, in case a major quake hits.

IANA Geologist, but I have been a science teacher and taught dozens of basic seismology lessons. This ain’t how it happens, folks.

The seismograph station (of which there must be several) sends a signal to the beeper of the seismologist on call. They either hook up to the seismographs over the internet, or in dire communication circumstances goes to a station and reads the seismograph traces.

They eyeball (or use Expert System software programmed to eyeball) the traces to see when the primary and secondary seismological waves arrived at each station. They begin together, but travel at different speeds, you see. Using a technique exaclty analogous to the old “count the seconds between the lightning and the thunder to find out how far the storm is” technique, they determine the distance of that station from the epicenter of the quake.

Estimates from at least three stations are needed to use triangulation to figure out where the epicenter is. Armed with this info, each station’s intensity is compared to its distance from the epicenter, and a pre-existing mathematical formula is used to determine the Richter Number (they actually don’t use the original Richter scale anymore, but I forget the term for the numbering system now in current use) of the quake at each station. These are more or less averaged out to give the “official” intensity that is then immediately sent to broadcast outlets.

It all takes a few minutes folks, and doesn’t change moment to moment, as implied in the ad.

Word has it that further geological fallacies abound in this anticipated howler of a film.

This is the same peeve I have at this point with the computer errors. EVERYONE uses a computer nearly every day, especially the writers who wrote the episode.

Yet the behavior of the machines on TV runs counter to anything people actually experience day to day.

Don’t forget turning attractive female prisoners into sex slaves! Guards at women’s prisons barely have time to do their jobs because they’re so busy screwing all of the hot incarcerated babes!

We watched Angel run a red light in the “Vegas” episode.

I agree with the digital imaging pet peeves. The most egregious was when some show was trying to catch a child-porn badguy and they got his picture by blowing up his reflection in a child’s pupil! My eyes rolled so bad I saw my tonsils.

I can’t wait to be a professional so I can complain about how my profession is horribly misrepresented in television and movies.

I made the mistake of watching Backdraft with my father and grandfather, both professional firefighters with a combined 65 years of experience between them.

As my father used to point out, during the dramatic scene where Kurt Russell’s running through the fire with the child in his arms, Russell’s coat is unbuttoned. When I tried to say that Russell was trying to help shield the kid from the flames, my father laughed.

Oh, and as a standard procedure in the Louisville, KY area, brothers (or any other relatives, for that matter), are NEVER placed in the same fire house on the same shift. The local government realizes that there are too many possibilities for family members to be injured/killed in the line of duty, and so they try to minimize the potential family suffering. And, if, by some cosmic malignment, they ARE placed together, one will NEVER be in a position of authority over the other.

Any others, and I’d have to watch the movie again.

As a brewer, I always winced at The Drew Carey Show. Buzz Beer just made me want to drink. (So…THANK YOU, DREW! :smiley: ) The list of laws they violated with that brewery in the garage, selling it door to door, etc. makes me cringe. Not to mention that their sanitation techniques were a bit…iffy.

In other words, “CSI” really is quite realistic.

I work at a paging service. I laughed quite loudly when in a soap opera someone called a doctor. The paging service on the show just put the patient directly through to the doctor without giving him a chance to say anything or announcing the call. Of course, it was one of those typical soap opera moments where it happened to be the last person the doctor wanted to talk to. It was also terribly inaccurate. Doctors around here usually don’t take calls after their office hours and if they do, they don’t accept them without knowing who they’re coming from. And it’s almost never a direct patch to the doctor- he will take their info and call them back.

I’m sure I could find a lot of other communication protocols to nitpick but they’re usually pretty obvious.