I think it’s important to point out that the most controversial and impactful decisions made by the SCOTUS this term all advance stated objectives of Project 2025:
Immunity ruling: Shields presidents from prosecution under many circumstances and increases their power in pursuit of their Unitary Executive theory;
Snyder, the ruling on gratuities: Allows kickbacks for state officials after they accomplish some ask by a grateful entity. Just be sure to pay the bribe after the action and not before, and make sure you call it a “gratuity.” This ruling increases opportunities for corruption and manipulation of state governments without penalty and makes it much easier for monied interests to accomplish their objectives at the state level. Goes hand-in-hand with the Chevron decision outlined below.
The Chevron decision rolls back regulatory protections for Americans in a big way. It removes regulatory agencies, together with their expertise, from being the final arbiters of best practices in their industries and places that power in the courts. This goes far toward accomplishing the stated Project 2025 objective of getting rid of regulation over affected companies and industries. Like fossil fuels.
Make sure you understand that the so-called “conservative” justices on the SCOTUS are all in and part of the implementation of Project 2025. It is already well underway.