Proof That God Exists: An Open Debate For The Existence of God

Sorry this took so long, life beckons.

I have not had the time to finish this, but I am well aware many of you want answers to many of your questions. Regardless of what I write, I know there will be many more points to address from so many of you, that quite frankly, I’m starting to feel like I’ve gotten myself in over my head. I was going to write much, much more in the following, but I simply do not have the time at the moment. I haven’t even gotten around to the most important point I wanted to address, and that is of Absolute Moral Laws. I was saving it for the last of the rebuttal, where I planned on putting the most attention at; but I just cannot at this present time find the time to do so.

Without getting too personal, a family member needs my attention right now; and between them, my job, my wife, trying to write my thoughts here, and putting some free time in somewhere; I can not articulate my thoughts as well as I’d like to. Some of you may view this whole thing as a giant waste of your time, and if you do, I am very sorry to have wasted it. I have enough written to give you all a good idea as to where I’m coming from, but this is a very far from cry from the rebuttal I intended to write. I haven’t even had the time to list my references and sources; let alone actually finish this.

I will try to come back to this as quickly as I can, and I mean that; but sometimes life tends to get in the way when you least expect it. I won’t even be around to see any of your replies to this particular post for at least a week or so, but I will be back. I did not intend to post a giant wall of thoughts and leave everyone to debate amongst their selves, but the embarrassment of my lack of involvement will have to take second to the center stage of life for the moment.

With what I feel is adequate explanation of absence, I shall move on to my half ass rebuttal. I hope to be back at some point to discuss this topic further with you all.


I think one member summed my feelings up on this rather well…

I agree. There is no way I can reply to everyone, so I’ll stick to the most important points brought up and we can go from there. From what I’ve read, the biggest glaring issue with the presented proof so far is the declaration of Absolute Moral Laws. Also, I have noticed many curious as to how I arrived at the Christian God, and not the God of Judaism or other monotheistic religions. Finally, I have noticed many members expressing a desire to know why I wish to bring this up at all, how qualified I feel to deliver such a declaration, and overall what the purpose of this debate is.

I will attempt to address these issues within this reply to the best of my ability. *{Author’s Note- This was written before I realized I wouldn’t have time to finish, so all topics mentioned above are not addressed within this reply.}
Firstly, I do not consider myself a highly educated man. I have only a high school education to go on, as I never attended college. I have never entered a classroom on philosophy or religion, and I am not familiar with some of the terminology used by some of the members. I have no idea what “Gödel’s Impossibility Theorem” is. I have never heard of the word Aristotelian, yet alone have a basis of knowledge as to what it is. I have never traveled outside of the U.S.A., and I live in the southeastern region of the country, which is well known for being “The Bible Belt”. I have a Christian upbringing, as stated in the OP, and I have a biased viewpoint, as also stated in the OP.

So, to answer the question of if I feel I’m qualified to deliver this declaration of proof, I will hastily say “NO!”.
Secondly, I am sharing this for a multitude of reasons. From an emotional standpoint, I came to a personal revelation from this viewpoint and it brought me such great pleasure, I felt the need to share with others what I view as something amazing; even though such is a naïve concept, and quite frankly will most likely never be accepted as adequate proof of God. That in itself is half the reason for sharing my feelings; I came into this knowing full well how much harsh criticism this topic would receive. I want to see the disagreement of others, for that disagreement fills another primary desire for posting this thread to begin with.

The other primary desire I speak of is to share this from an intellectual standpoint. I wish to share this viewpoint for the sake of broadening my own horizons, and possibly that of others. Mainly my own, as I feel I am ignorant of many world views. I hope to learn something from this, even if it’s only what others feel of this viewpoint. I presented this to gain knowledge, even through the harshest of criticisms. I feel there is no better way to gain a greater understanding of God than through the disagreement of others. I feel that it’s through those same disagreements that a greater basis of faith can be formed. What I mean by that, is by viewing counter arguments to my presented proof, I gain a greater faith in God. The same naïve part of myself that I mentioned earlier makes me want to think others may arrive at the same conclusion; however unlikely that may be.
Thirdly, how did I arrive at the Christian God, as opposed to other monotheistic religions? Why do I refer to the Christian God at all? Why not keep this focused on simply intelligent design; which some might agree would seem to possibly make more sense?

Well, to answer that I will have to give a bit of personal history, along with debatable facts. I say debatable facts, because the facts that I will provide are accepted to be true by some, while denied by others. I will try to keep the following as brief as possible and as clear as I can. To begin, I need to roll the clock back a bit. I’ll take you back to when I was only a child.
As a boy, I was raised by a loving mother; one of a Nondenominational Christian upbringing. When I was young, my mother and biological father went through a divorce, and soon after my mother met another man; one that would eventually become by father through adoption. My stepdad turned father was, and to this day is, a complex individual. He believes that there is a divine creator to the universe, but chooses to follow no particular faith. Through the raising of him and my mother, I have grown into the man I am today.

Through the years as I grew, I had many questions; most of which fell to my mother for answering. She answered my questions to the best of her ability, and taught tolerance and love for the rest of the world to me. She absolutely convinced me as a child that Jesus was our salvation, and that God loved us all. I believed that with all my heart when I was younger, and I knew that my mother was one of the greatest people on this planet. She had more faith in God than any other person I have ever met, and I knew God would always protect her. Through her spiritual teachings, I gained a great curiosity about the human race and the universe we live in. I have always thought about the universe around me, and how others besides myself live. I constantly find myself asking “what if”, “how”, and “why” about many things, especially when it comes to subjects that none of us have yet to find a definitive answer to. I have turned to many people over the years to talk about such subjects, but have never had the opportunity to pursue such within a formal education. I was taken care of when I was younger, but I have always lived a life that would most likely qualify as somewhere between “low class” and “middle class” America. As a result, my parents didn’t have the money to send me to college, and I have never had the resources to purse a college education myself.

So, like so many others, I attended public school and lived the average life of an American. All was mostly going well in my life, until the year 2002. My mother was diagnosed with stage four breast cancer, with the cancerous cells already present with her liver as well. With the above mentioned information presented in the above paragraph, I feel certain you can imagine my shock of discovering this. It destroyed me. I didn’t understand anything in the world anymore, and I hated God. I told myself that I didn’t believe in God anymore, and that all along, everyone else was right. I told myself that I was a fool. What an idiot to think there was such a thing as a divine creator…a loving God that cared for His people. What total fucking godamn bullshit, I thought.

My mother died in 2005. I was nineteen.

The years after her death were not kind to me, or I should rather say, I was not kind to myself and others. I hated everything, and I felt the need to express my hatred to others, through any means necessary. Every time I saw someone happy, it sickened me. I wanted to fucking kill them. I eventually started to hate myself for being such a worthless little bitch. I saw people in worse situations than me, people that didn’t even have the luxury of having a roof to sleep under, or food to eat; much less the luxury of having a loving mother to tell you “I Love You”. I saw just how many other people in the world were mistreated, right from the start, and I knew that there truly was no God. I knew back then that no loving God would allow so much pain and misery in this world. There I was, being sad and miserable over my mother dying, while others woke up everyday to the sound of war outside their home. I was pathetic, and I knew it. I made myself sick, and all I wanted to do was die. I made a couple of attempts at killing myself, but never could do it; for the knowledge of knowing others were far worse off than me made me want to be stronger than that.

I stumbled through life for several years, trying to put the pieces back together. I eventually gained my desire for knowledge back, but it wasn’t the same as it was before. I wanted to know the horrors of the world, and I wanted to see the pain of others. Due to my lack of a formal education, I turned to books and the internet for that information. I viewed things that made me see the horrors of mankind, and all the while confirmed my thoughts that there was no God. I developed the belief that all religion was false, and was purely a manmade creation formulated by the minds of early man. More or less, I considered myself an Atheist. I never studied the philosophies of Atheism, I only knew that the concept of a God was ridiculous. I believed that because I felt man was nothing but an animal; an intelligent species of evolved apes that could do nothing but eat and shit out this planets resources. I felt that I started to develop a hatred for mankind, for myself, and for any supposed God that might exist in some form. Wherever I traveled, I had nothing but contempt for my fellow man, and expressed that contempt wherever and whenever humanly possible.

I can’t remember the first, but I eventually discovered message boards. I know it wasn’t the very first, but I can remember spending a great deal of time at a site called Gamewinners.com. I joined the message boards there and I was an absolutely horrible human being. I was the definitive definition of an “online troll”, and I did everything I could to destroy the feelings of others. It brought me satisfaction knowing how bad I was making other people feel. Looking back on that time in my life now, to say I feel ashamed of my actions in a grievous understatement.

From the years of '05 through '09, I spent all of my time doing one of a set schedule of actions. Those actions consisted of: Working twelve to fourteen hours a day, five days a week; exercising, mainly in an attempt to torture myself for being such a miserable human being; harassing people online at regular intervals through online discussions and online video games; searching the worst things imaginable online; getting drunk; and attempting to understand the origins of the human race, which I hated so much. I wanted to find out how scientists, theorists, philosophers, physicists, astrophysicists, and the like understood the universe. I wanted to know how all of this began, and why the human race exists.

In my quest to find answers, I came across something known as the Drake Equation. I didn’t realize it at the time, but this equation would create a spark which would ignite a chain reaction throughout my mind; one that would eventually lead me to what I feel is the greatest discovery of my life. That discovery is what I have presented on this message board.

To explain what The Drake Equation is to those unfamiliar with it, I will fall to Wikipedia to copy and paste the information here. I am doing this in an attempt to shave some time off this rebuttal.


The Drake equation is a probabilistic argument used to arrive at an estimate of the number of active, communicative extraterrestrial civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy. The number of such civilizations, N, is assumed to be equal to the mathematical product of (i) the average rate of star formation, R*, in our galaxy, (ii) the fraction of formed stars, fp, that have planets, (iii) the average number of planets per star that has planets, ne, that can potentially support life, (iv) the fraction of those planets, fl, that actually develop life, (v) the fraction of planets bearing life on which intelligent, civilized life, fi, has developed, (vi) the fraction of these civilizations that have developed communications, fc, i.e., technologies that release detectable signs into space, and (vii) the length of time, L, over which such civilizations release detectable signals, for a combined expression of:

N = the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communication might be possible (i.e. which are on our current past light cone);
and
R* = the average rate of star formation in our galaxy
fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets
ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets
fl = the fraction of planets that could support life that actually develop life at some point
fi = the fraction of planets with life that actually go on to develop intelligent life (civilizations)
fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
L = the length of time for which such civilizations release detectable signals into space

The equation was written in 1961 by Frank Drake, not for purposes of quantifying the number of civilizations,[better source needed] but as a way to stimulate scientific dialogue at a meeting on the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI). The equation summarizes the main concepts which scientists must contemplate when considering the question of other radio-communicative life. Criticism towards the Drake equation follows from the fact that several of its terms are conjectural, the net result being that the error associated with any derived value is very large such that the equation cannot be used to draw firm conclusions.

There is considerable disagreement on the values of these parameters, but the ‘educated guesses’ used by Drake and his colleagues in 1961 were:
⦁ R* = 1/year (1 star formed per year, on the average over the life of the galaxy; this was regarded as conservative)
⦁ fp = 0.2-0.5 (one fifth to one half of all stars formed will have planets)
⦁ ne = 1-5 (stars with planets will have between 1 and 5 planets capable of developing life)
⦁ fl = 1 (100% of these planets will develop life)
⦁ fi = 1 (100% of which will develop intelligent life)
⦁ fc = 0.1-0.2 (10-20% of which will be able to communicate)
⦁ L = 1000-100,000,000 years (which will last somewhere between 1000 and 100,000,000 years)
Inserting the above minimum numbers into the equation gives a minimum N of 20. Inserting the maximum numbers gives a maximum of 50,000,000. Drake states that given the uncertainties, the original meeting concluded that N ≈ L, and there were probably between 1000 and 100,000,000 civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy.


What I took away from the discovery of this equation was an insatiable curiosity. I was fascinated by this subject, and became obsessed with numbers; despite knowing jack shit about math. I wanted to know the odds of creation. I wanted to find out how probable it was that mankind was created by chance, as opposed to intelligent design; and I wanted to find out which was more likely. I stopped believing in a God, but I still wanted to know if it was possible for a deity to exist at all, considering my upbringing. As stated prior, I’ve never had the opportunity to pursue a higher education, but I did what I could to find source material to answer my questions about life. I researched the best I knew how into subjects of cell creation, star creation, planet creation, etc.

In my personal studies, I came across the subject of amino acid construction. I was amazed at the complexity of the human body. Assembling amino acids into the sequence required to produce a functioning protein is no easy task. What are the odds that this can happen by accident? Let’s assume we have equal quantities of all the amino acids in a huge barrel, and we want to calculate the odds of drawing out amino acids in a sequence that results in a functioning protein. Twenty different amino acids are used to make proteins, and nineteen of these come in two varieties: left or right-handed. Only the left handed ones are useful for making proteins. This means there are a total of thirty nine different kinds of amino acids in the barrel, but only twenty of them are eligible for use in protein construction.

As each amino acid is randomly selected from the barrel, it must bond to the amino acid selected previously. In this way a protein is formed piece by piece, but there is no guarantee that this bond will occur. In the absence of the proper enzymes( which in this experiment, do not exist yet since their existence depends on fully functioning cells, complete with DNA, RNA, etc. ), the chances of these bonds forming are very, very low. For the sake of argument though, lets take the probability of this bond forming to be fifty percent. To further increase the chances of success, lets calculate the odds of randomly selecting and successfully forming one of the shortest functional proteins that is common to living systems: the cytochrome- C enzyme. It is merely 110 amino acids in length, but lets shorten this further to only 100 amino acids.

Now for the math.

The odds of getting a specific chain of 100 amino acids by chance would be the probability of selecting the right amino acid( 1 out of 39 ), 100 times in a row, and with a fifty percent chance of the chemical bond forming between each. In mathematical notation, that probability is: Probability= (1/39)100 x (1/2)99. This comes out to be (1/10)190.

Written out, that number looks like 1 divided by 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

Numbers with that many zeros are absolutely meaningless to us. For comparison, a probability of 1 in 1050 would be the same likelihood that every person on the planet would win the Powerball Grand Prize once per second not just for the rest of their lives, but for the next 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years! Obviously that cannot happen, and yet this wildly improbable scenario is not nearly as improbable as the amino acid illustration above. Or consider the fact that scientists have calculated that there are about 1080 protons and neutrons in the whole universe. If one proton in the entire universe were painted purple, the chances of you randomly selecting it would be 1080. Even so, this is still far more probable that the amino acid illustration. So what do you think, did life arise by chance? I most certainly started to think not after coming to this realization.

After realizing this, I could no longer deny that this universe was created by intelligent design; so I found myself back to believing there was a God. The evidence was too overwhelming to hold on to the belief this universe was created by chance. With a newfound belief that there was in fact a God that created everything, I started to ponder how any of it made any sense. There are so many religions in he world, and I knew they couldn’t all be right. However, I did believe that there was a God, so I wanted to find out. I came from a Christian upbringing, but I wasn’t going to jump back on that bandwagon…at least not immediately. I wanted to know how other religions worked, and what others believed.
**Here is where I stopped. ~TO BE CONTINUED.~

Upon proof reading this again for the third time, I noticed I forgot something very important. On the numbers towards the bottom, I meant for “1 in 1050” to read 1050. The same goes for “1080”. It is ten to the fiftieth power and ten to the eightieth power, not 1,050 and 1,080. I could not edit it in, since the rules prohibit doing so after five minutes; didn’t know that. >_<

You realize that the first life was not human, right? It was probably very simple. All you need is a self-reproducing molecule. Do you think that’s impossible? Once you have that, it will not copy itself perfectly. Some of the bad copies will not reproduce as well (or at all) as the original, and will die out. But some will do better, will reproduce faster, and will replace the original. Repeat for a billion years or so and you’ll get the complexity we see today.

Here is an analogy I like. Say you have a combination lock consisting of 100 dials of 10 characters each. You don’t know the combination, but want to open it. Impossible, right?
But I didn’t tell you one thing. Each time you turn a dial to the right number, it makes a click. Now opening the lock is trivial.
Since mutations which improve the chances of survival get locked in, little by little, evolution is like my combination lock. And even better, since unlike my lock evolution is not aiming to a particular goal.

I think most of us here know the Drake equation quite well - I’ve read some of the early classic books on SETI. Mostly the values in the equation have turned out to be higher than the original conservative estimates. Hell, we’ve just found a planet circling the nearest star to us (save the Sun.) We don’t know how often life evolves, since we only have one example.
I’d recommend that you read some of the good books on this, like “Climbing Mt. Improbable” by Richard Dawkins, which is specifically addressed to the improbability argument. Though the church bulletins may not admit it, biologists are well aware of the so-called problems you bring up - and they are not problems at all.

One more thing - while answering all the posts is impractical, you really should read and understand some of them, and respond to at least a few. You’ll learn a lot more doing this than just regurgitating specious arguments against evolution.
Many people here have lots of education, many are specialists in their fields. You can learn just by listening.

About your bit about the astronomical chances of amino acids forming proteins randomly.
They are not formed randomly.
The chains of amino acids are actually built to their specific order by our RNA.
RNA ‘translates’ (the term for ‘ordering’ amino acids) them into a certain type of protein, such as an enzyme.

The chance that a puddle fits into a puddle-shaped hole is also astronomical, but it does, every time. Working out the chance that any complex system exists in a particular state is meaningless unless you understand the chain of causality that leads to that state. In the case of amino acids the chain of causality is driven by selection through fitness.

Note as well that it is wrong to imagine that there is only one endpoint to the process of molecular evolution; there are, by some estimates, 10e24 planets in the observable universe.The number of different possible, viable biochenistries using amino acids and nucleic acid is so vast that every one of those planets could have a different version without repeating themselves. Just as puddles are infinitely variable, so are the possibilities for life.

It doesn’t matter how remote the odds are of something happening in a given year; when given enough years, the odds of this occurring at least once becomes near certainty. With evolution, once is enough.

Nah, every number no matter how large has a very clear and distinct meaning, unambiguous even.

If you were to answer some of the previous comments, I’d like you to consider answering the comments posted by your fellow Christians. You’ve admitted a limited knowledge base in science and math and frankly I’m wondering how deep your knowledge is concerning matters theological.

For example, you’ve mentioned you are married. Do you follow the Absolute Moral Laws concerning your periodic uncleanliness? If not, then why not?

Your ‘randomly selected amino acid’ scenario is only applicable to the creation of humans if said creator is trying to make a human all at once by randomly selecting specific amino acid combinations out of all possible combinations for every single component of the human body. This makes no sense, and is a well known and feeble bit of creationist tripe.

Organisms and their amino acid/protein mechanisms evolved slowly, with each successive generation building on what the previous generation already had. You’re suggesting we became human with one gigantic leap, while evolution says that it happened in millions of tiny successive steps.

If you really are fascinated about amino acid production, and are not just a creationist proselytizer, go read about their evolution. Quoting old and long refuted creationist babble isn’t really getting you anywhere here.

Please forgive me for not taking your personal revelation based on specious arguments as “proof”. The only thing you have proven to me is that our opinions differ.

Jed. you write very well for someone of no college education, and you at least have considered other paths before settling on this one. You’re constantly learning. You’re embarking on a life-long quest to solve the great mysteries of the universe, and if you attribute your inspiration to faith in God, more power to you. You’re among many others here who may have higher learning, but also struggle with making sense of the universe.

One thing that’s hard for us humans to understand is just how long a billion years can be. We tend to think the universe’s lifespan is equivalent to our own, and the thought that life existed prior to humanity is hard to visualize. We’re really making best guesses based on evidence we dug out of the ground and constantly change and micromanage the methods we use to make observations and implement them. It’s not as assuring as relying on the Bible for answers, which is only one source of information, and does not describe the universe before the birth of humanity.

The odds of an amino acid forming may be astrological, and certainly would not occur overnight. You’re forgetting about the billions of years it took for this process to take place. If you attribute this to Intelligent Design, fine. You can also accept the possibility that since God is eternal, He has been going through billions of years of trial and error to create our universe, and He hasn’t stopped yet.

Take a deck of cards and shuffle them thoroughly. Deal them all out face up in a line. The odds of dealing that specific sequence of cards is incredibly unlikely (1 in about 8x10^67) - so how did you manage it?
Use two different decks of cards and you reduce your chance of dealing the sequence that you do actually deal to 1 in 10^166.
Use three different decks of cards, and you reduce your chances to 1 in 7.5 x 10^275
(that’s many orders of magnitude less likely than your amino acid probability.

So it should be simply impossible to shuffle and deal out three packs of cards, right?

Creationist Henry Morris made the same mistake. If something can happen in a large number of ways, N, then the odds of that happening must be 1/N. But this isn’t quite right. Why only 1? This gives the random odds of one specific cell’s DNA arising. It’s like specifying a retinal cell in Willie, the giraffe in the Cleveland Zoo, back in the 1950’s. Why only that one (1) definition of success? Why not any other cell in that giraffe’s body, or in any giraffe, or in any living thing?

Also, why only one (1) trial? The chemicals get mixed, nothing happens, oh, well, that’s the end of it forever. No: the chemicals get mixed, re-mixed, re-mixed again, trillions of times on trillions of planets.

The legerdemain of selecting “1” as the number of possible successes is bad math/statistics.

Also, the “gosh, it’s unlikely” argument still fails to point toward the Christian God. Odin or Zeus might have done it.

Also, why not polytheism? I mean, even assuming we grant for the sake of argument that unlikeliness points to a creator, some folks looked at this vast and varied world and said, hey, wouldn’t it make tons of sense to chalk stuff up to creators?

Like I said, in ancient Greece people figured that one deity came up with olive trees, and another deity came up with horses, and a third deity was smiting transgressors from on high with thunderbolts; if they’d ever seen a platypus, I’m guessing they’d have chalked it up to – Epimetheus? Yeah, probably Epimetheus.

Or…why not a creation-sacrifice? Maybe God died to create the universe (much as Christ is claimed to have died to defeat sin.) Maybe we’re all inside the rotting corpse of Ymir/YHWH/a Marvel Comics Celestial/whatevs.

(What if we’re in God’s little toe? And it gets bitten off by a snapping turtle! Watch out for turtles, God!)

Is this a bad time to note that it’s turtles all the way down?

It’s very, very unlikely to win the lottery too. But there are winners.

Given 4.5 billion years, earth hit the jackpot. How many stars and solar systems and planets in our galaxy alone? It’s inevitable that some planet would hit the jackpot.

Why attribute an eventual sure thing to a god? And to the OP, why is it important to do so?

The odds are astronomical …

never tell me the odds.

may the odds be forever in your favor.

(take your pick)

The odds of successfully traversing an asteroid field can’t be too awfully bad: our space probes have done it a couple dozen times.

That’s because the average distance between asteroids in the belt is 600,000km. (http://discovery.nasa.gov/SmallWorlds/mars2.cfml). Asteroid fields like in The Empire Strikes Back are a product of fiction.
I will note for OP, I’m both amused and annoyed by people that start their explanation with a long paragraph about how they don’t have enough time to add more stuff in. If you didn’t spent time writing about how little time you have, you’d have enough time to finish what you were trying to say in the first place!

I also sorta wish these arguments would happen after a bit of internet searching. Instead of posting the tired old “but humans are complex, so it couldn’t have been evolution, therefore GOD!” argument, which has been debunked many times, I rather wish people would search the main points of their argument with “criticism” or “counterpoints” or even “debunked” and try to understand whether they have a good argument before vomiting it across the web. OP is smart enough to do that much if they are as well-written as they appear here.

For example, searching “sye ten bruggencate debunked” (that is, the original author of the 7 part steps to ‘proving’ god in post 1) comes up with 2350 results in Google. It would have been nice if OP had read one or two of those before starting this thread.