Protests happening around the world

It’s reverse-justification because the picture of Obama used on that charming poster is actually of a Papua New Guinea tribesman. Because of course, we were supposed to infer from the poster that the Tea Party fellows were commenting on the cargo cult mentality of the left. They would never be so crass as to use an image that compared a black guy’s health care plan to a bone-through-the-nose cartoon depiction of a witch doctor because that might seem obviously racist to, I don’t know, anyone who doesn’t have a copy of the poster. That said, the post was sort of threadshitting and this is turning into a hijack.

Not much, but when it comes to love, ooh boy, lemme tell ya! Oo, ee, oo ah ah, ting, tang, walla-walla bing-bang! :smiley:

Well, here’s what Wikipedia has to say about cargo cults:

That description has a strong and disturbing resemblance to the progressive mentality.

To the average lefty, wealth is something the state can conjure out of nothingness by decree. The state can place any number of restrictions and burdens on production without consequences, the economy will always be able to bear new taxes, there will always be money for new state bureaucracies and programs, the magic of Keynesian economics will always save us from disaster, capital will never flee to more business friendly parts of the globe, and the people who are expected to produce the wealth to support all of this will never just say, “Aw, fuck it,” and walk away. It’s utterly impossible that we could end up like Greece or Spain, let alone North Korea or Zimbabwe, 'cuz this is America and things like that just don’t happen in America. God is protecting us or something. And if any of this goes wrong, it’s the fault of hate-filled white people who won’t go along with the plan working their mysterious evil juju against you.

That’s pretty much the mentality of the Occupy Wall Street wankers and not a few people here on the SDMB. It’s entirely fair and reasonable to point out the strong resemblance between cargo cultists and a huge number of progressives.

Of course, Wall Street does have an awful lot to answer for, and crony capitalism is a major cause of the mess we’re in. But Occupy Wall Street has no answers and never will. They’re as irrational and potentially as dangerous as the mobs that so recently roamed the streets of Athens.

I think I might agree if I closed my eyes, reread the description, and then spun around until I got very dizzy. Since I’m not going to do that, I see no resemblance. With that, I should stop indulging this silliness.

rozzybear, I think it’s somewhat ironic that your comments about pharma and Dr. Burzynski would not be particularly popular among the Wall Street demonstrators - this is the kind of commentary people are talking about when they say the demonstrators have no focus. Pharma is way, way down the list of concerns, and there’s no particular link between the pharmaceutical industry (or, say, the energy industry) and Wall Street. Wall Street is associated with the financial industry.

You’re right Marley23-poor hijack, more suitable for a Pitting than a serious discussion.
Back to the topic at hand:

How dare Big Pharma repress our right to be cheated by snake oil salesmen!

This seems ridiculously naive. Google “nuclear power plant public hearings”. Did they ask whether they could build them? Yes. Did a bunch of people say “No”? Yes. Did a bunch of other people say “Yes”? Also yes. Did the protests get a metric shit ton of publicity? Very much yes.

As a result of this horrible mockery of democracy and capitalism in action, we now eke out our miserable existences in a blasted landscape populated only by mutants and hot women in fur bikinis. No, wait, sorry, I misspelled "get 19% of our electricity supplied by nuclear plants". Number of fatalities directly attributed to the nuclear nature of the plants: 0.

[quote=“John_Mace, post:11, topic:598554”]

This was already linked to and quoted in the Pit thread, but let’s look at what these people are saying:
snip
They have continuously sought to strip employees of the right to negotiate for better pay and safer working conditions.
Probably. But that’s what unions are for.
QUOTE]

Except…not everyone has a union to protect them, or a good union, for that matter.
And unions in general are under attack in this country while more workers are told to work harder and longer, for no additional pay, and they don’t dare complain for fear of being labeled with a “bad attitude” or fired.