According to an article in this week’s NEWSWEEK (cover: SPECIAL REPORT: the War Plan), America plans to use an ‘E-bomb’ as a member of its aresenal against Iraq.
Later in the article:
Ok, maybe the Brave New World allusion was a bit of a stretch, this isn't hypnopaedic brainwashing. But it is morally questionable.
IF We ‘liberate’ Iraq from Saddam’s rule, the people are free from HIS rule. I do not know how many Iraqis would openly comply with the US, but I do know that those who would cooperate may not be doing so with free will. We are not exactly forcing the Iraqis to embrace US occupation of Iraq with open arms, and we’re not ‘brain-washing’ them, but most importantly, we’re not quite ‘liberating’ them.
Saddam Hussein is like Orwell's Big Brother. He wants his people to know that he's always watching; the people can't forget this fact as they are forced to display his portrait almost everywhere. Hussein's stern face glares down from the highest buildings. He has gassed his own people for not complying with his policies. Fear and Power are his weapons, and the people are enslaved by them. Eliminating Hussein will most likely not have immediate positive results for the Iraqis. And although it is likely that many Iraqis dislike Saddam's rule, that does not mean that they're the biggest fans of the US. IF the psy-ops work as they are intended, and people comply, there is no way to tell if this would happen if the people REALLY had the ability to make the choice on their own. There are ways of persuading people to help you or do your bidding. Hussein chooses violence, death, and fear as his incentive. In his case, actions speak louder than words. The US wantst the compliance of the Iraqis, and feels it can be earned through reason. Psy-ops only spoon-feeds US propaganda into the Iraqis' minds, why are we concealing our message in such transmissions? And what does it say about the United States?