It had to happen eventually. “Craft beer” appeared in sea of Miller and Bud. It was salvation from terrible pilsners that all tasted alike and were as weak as water.
So now, “craft distilleries” are appearing in a sea of… Four Roses… and… Laphroaig?!
The analogy doesn’t quite hold up, does it? Nope, not even a bit. Even in the dark, dark ages of beer one could find some excellent booze if one looked.
On the shelves of the liquor store, one can find all manner of underaged bourbons and ryes (many of them distilled by giant MGP right here in Indiana but aged elsewhere and given creative brands–how “craft”) sold for more than fully aged bottom-shelf booze that is superior–such as everything bottled in bond by Heaven Hill.
Heck, do a blind tasting. Put Old Grandad 114 next to most “craft-distilled” bourbons, and people are going to praise the bulldozer rye finish of the OGD and think the craft stuff is mass-produced.
A BIG caveat: I think it’s awesome that there are more distillers out there doing all manner of creative and interesting things. The Few rye whisky is pretty amazing, and it’s aged just for one year (how about two years and making it “straight rye whisky”–or even four, guys?!). Let a zillion flowers bloom. I just want to point out that the implicit analogy with craft brewing is wrong, that there are already so many great spirits out there that deserve exploration and respect, regardless of the volume of production. And I’d like to encourage truth in labeling and bit more aging of the product.
Thoughts?