Disclaimer: Please feel free to direct me to websites or books that answer my questions or address my examples. I am interested in clear easy to understand experimental evidence.
I have a novice question about the Observer effects on quantum events in experiments such as the electron two slit experiment. I have read many descriptions of the experiment, and I understand it has been replicated many times. But every time I read an explanation of the experiment I have this huge desire to scream, “But…did they try this? And what happened?”
Now I am going to explain my screaming need to know, and hopefully someone out there will respond, “Yes of course they tried that and if you want to read all about it go here.”
My screaming need to know:
So you shoot an electron beam at two slits and you get an interference pattern.
Then you shoot electrons at two slits one at a time and you STILL get an interference pattern. Wow.
But then you put a detector at each of the slits so you can see which slit each electron actually went through. And then the interference pattern stops. BIG WOW.
Conclusion usually expressed: The act of observing the electrons “choice” of slits forces the electron to act in a different way. (collapsing possibility waves and what not). In other words, the simple act of having a conscious observer of the electron changes how the electron behaves. Wow.
So here is my screaming need to know. I am sure this is a stupid question, so please direct me to really well explained easy to comprehend experimental evidence that I can peruse. My question is, are they sure? Are they sure the detector isn’t the cause of the electrons change in behavior? There are certainly experiments that could verify whether the simple act of conscious observation truly is the cause. I would like to get them to set up an experiment that shows if the observer is facing the apparatus, the electron goes one way. But if the observer closes his/her eyes then the electron behaves differently. If this was demonstrated that would really be impressive…at least to me. (and as I’ve said, I hope this has been done and you can just tell me where to go read about it!)
Here is my very rudimentary example of such an experiment.
- Put the detector in place and have it detect the electrons “choice” but not record the choice anywhere. Then have noone watching the “read out” on the detector. No conscious observer of the electron. Does it create an interference pattern or not?
- Now have an observer watching the read out. Now how does the electron behave?
- Have the detector watching and recording the results on a single media. Have no observer watching the read out AND have no one looking at the results on the media. Then after the test immediately destroy the media before any observer has observed the results. Again in this example, there would have been NO conscious observation of the electrons “choice”. Now what was the result on the target? An interference pattern or not?
Experiment number 3 is particularly interesting to me…because it will create paradoxes. But if what matters really is whether or not a conscious observer witnesses the electron’s choice of slits, then this should be a valid experiment. If the recording device alone affects the electrons choices then the observer is ruled out as a relevant cause.
Ok let me have it. Please go slowly.