Question re: "Fight Science" and Western swordsmanship

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you Titus Manlius Torquatus, first appearing in Livy’s Ab Urbe Condita, book 7, paragraphs 9 and 10. Here’s a link via Project Gutenberg to an English translation.

And here’s the relevant bit, from paragraph 10:

Now, I realize you said Rome aside, but since we’re talking about single combat between Romans and other folks, it seems a bit silly to exclude the Romans. :slight_smile:

I also wanted to recommend the movie The Duellists. Harvey Keitel and Keith Carradine might not be the first two actors you’d think of to portray French officers under Napoleon, but they both were convincing. As the title implies, they fight not just one but numerous duels, using a variety of weaponry including smallswords and military sabers, with the appropriate techniques.

Goths? I meant Gauls.

One of the reasons I particularly wanted Maeglin to participate is that he once told me a story about the master-at-arms (or whatever) from a European military ship taking on a samurai or other swordmaster in an exhibition-type matchup sometime early in the relationship between Europe/Japan. From what I understand, it escalated quickly from an exhibition match to a full-on deathmatch, and the European, who was a master with the shortsword (or smallsword. I don’t remember which, or even if there’s a difference,) ended up carving the samurai into little pieces. This was apparently a serious blow to the honor of the household, and set back relations greatly.

Anybody have any other information on this anecdote?

Is this the Maeglin post you were thinking of (closest thing I could find on the SDMB) or was it an offboard comment?

Huh. It was an offboard comment, and this may be a different incident. I think I distinctly remember it being in Japan at the dawn of the age of European trade. I could be very wrong, though.

Thanks for the legwork.

The Wikipedia Article has a couple of illos, and if you follow the links you’ll find more comprehensive treatments, including videos.

Yes and no. As time went on there was an increasing trend to more rigid constructions that emphasized the thrust as a means of penetrating improving ( or just increasingly common ) armor. A Viking era sword was almost pure cleaver, this one being a particularly extreme take on the idea:

http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/sword-viking-berserkr.htm

As opposed to some late-model war swords, that were still capable of slashing but were skewed far more to the other extreme, as with this model ( not yet prototyped ):

http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/sword-medieval-danish-2-hander.htm

Still, your point still stands that modern dueling, with the emphasis on the thrust being king, is descended from civilian dueling, rather than actual battlefield terchnique.

  • Tamerlane

And here I thought it was a clever reference to Highlander, with its …interesting…take on katana development.

Sorry I missed the party, old buddy. If I referred offboard to anything other than the 1911 Castello duel, I must have been smoking rock. I think I was wrong in the linked post: the engagement was fenced in the Bahamas, not Havana.

Incidentally, in the dawn of European/Japanese trade relations, there was no school of classical Italian sabre. The art of Japanese swordplay was also in its nascent stages of systematization and codification as well.

That said, I have never seen the TV show you reference, so I cannot comment in any informed way.