Questions About "Roger and Me"?

I just saw this old movie, and found it pretty funny. I have a few questions:
-one of the most pathetic parts of the flick was the attempt by the City of Flint, Michigan, to turn Flint into a tourist attraction!
The city spend >$150 million to build a downtown hotel, a big mall, and a torist museum (“Autoworld”).
According to the film, all of these venues closed down.
Do they still exist today? Or have they all been torn down?

I don’t know, but maybe Google Streetview would tell you.

I believe the sequel Pets or Meat: The Return to Flint showed Autoworld being blown up. It follows up on people and events of the first film.

They still raise rabbits inside the city and eat them?

Tough being a cute fuzzy bunny in Flint.

Tough being anyone in Flint.

It’s not inconceivable that a large city could die off.

There were a lot of mining towns in the West that were abandoned after the mines closed. Here in Arkansas there’s several towns in trouble. Their entire economy depended on one industry. For example a paper mill. It was the only major employer and the town is desperately trying to find another company that wants to move in.

It doesn’t pay to stay in a town where the major employer is gone. Trying to replace a monster gorilla like Ford is nearly impossible.

It can be done – Schenectady is managing with GE moving from major employer to a minor presence. But it takes a lot of work and good luck.

Autoworld was torn downin 1997. The land it sat on is now part of the University of Michigan-Flint.

Aw man, I loved going to Autoworld as a kid. It wasn’t like Disney World, or even Cedar Point level fun, but still, it was fun enough to do for the day.

Thanks for the replies.
I still can’t understand how anybody thought that Flint would become a tourist destination!
Seriously, why didn’t the city slash taxes and offer incentives to bring in business? Why wouldn’t a firm like Hyundai want to open a factory there-or was it the UAW scaring people away?:mad:

I doubt they anticipated people coming from more than a few hundred miles away. They probably weren’t planning on people from Chicago saying “Hey, let’s throw the kids in the car and drive five hours to AUTOWORLD!.” But tourism can be more locally focused and if they were able to pull in people from Saginaw, Bay City, Lansing, etc - they might have done ok. Also, Northern MI is a big tourism area, especially in the warmer months, and it’s not unlikely that they could have grabbed some of those people as they drove through.

Excellent questions. Back when I played Sim City 2000, Flint was by far the easiest scenario to win–just take industrial taxes to zero and jack them up for residential. People grumbled, but they still came in droves because of the jobs. Unfortunately, SC2K isn’t reality :frowning:

Unions, I’d imagine. Plenty of foreign car companies have built factories in America - in right to work states.

From Wikipedia:

By the way, wasn’t this movie known for being deceptive? I mean, didn’t he re-arrange the chronological order of things to make Flint look more foolish?

Either my Google-Fu is badly out of practice or there is simply nothing left online about this; either way, the late Pauline Kael’s famous review of this film is probably the definitive “Case for the Prosecution” against Roger and Me. I, for one, am an unabashed Michael Moore hater, and it has nothing to do with his politics at all - it is entirely due to how much I despised what he did with this film. The only thing left I can find of Kael’s review is this chunk from a cached page on an old GeoCities site (note that the film is available on LaserDisc!)-

If you can find the full review in one of her books (at your nearest library or bookstore) you should really read the whole thing. The short version is just as she mentions in the above paragraph: Moore pretends that this film is about Flint in 1989, but all the most damning things he has to say about it are taken far, far out of their actual chronology. The OP specifically mentions AutoWorld. Well, guess what - AutoWorld was built in 1984 and closed in its first year of operation, well before the dramatic downturn in Flint’s economy that the film purports to represent.

That’s the most dramatic lie that Moore tells in that movie (and since it’s a “documentary”, keep in mind that the person he’s lying to is YOU), but hardly the only one. Any time his story wasn’t provocative enough, he just pretended that things happened more interestingly than they really did. He’ll tell you it wasn’t a lie because all these things DID happen. And he never explicitly says that AutoWorld was built in 1989 at the height of Flint’s economic disaster - but if all you know about it is what he shows you in the film, you can’t help but come to that conclusion, which is exactly what he wants.

I could rant about that film for hours, but I’ll shut up now. If you’re truly interested, go find Pauline Kael’s excellent review (I believe it’s from 1/8/1990).

One of the more shocking lies in the movie is that Moore actually talked to Smith during the time period he was making the movie. No one should trust Moore farther than you could throw him.