I have to say I’m disappointed with the closing of this thread.
I realize that the topic is one that tends to generate a lot of unpleasantness, but . . . I’m disappointed that nobody had the opportunity to post some links, studies, etc. to back up Jillgat’s statements.
One last point: I know that it’s said again and again, but let me repeat – there’s a tendency for people to complain about the moderators on the unusual occasions where they have an issue, and remain silent on the many occasions where the moderators are perceived as doing fine. I apologise for whining in this way.
If they started closing every silly thread, the mods would be doing nothing else. Besides, what’s wrong with silly threads?
And Reeder, have fun adding a “who the fuck cares?” comment on every thread you don’t care about. Better start now, you have a lot of work ahead of you.
Just how big does a clitoris have to be before it’s a willy?
I remember an Angela Carter novel (The Infernal Desire Machines of Dr. Hoffman) which described a (fictional) tribe in which mother’s ritually manipulated their daughter’s wee clitties from birth until a certain age, the aim being to extend it – ideally until it was over six inches long. :eek: They had a creation myth involving a snake hiding in a woman’s belly, or some such thing.
What? I mean, like, huh? Why in the world should we bother to respond? Here’s the question:
The question really ought to be, “Is it also a well-known stereotype that black girls have larger clitorises than white girls?” To which the answer is, of course, “No.” And also, a Google search for “black female clitoris size” is hopeless, unless you’re interested in “latex fuck girls” websites.
Izzy:
Excuse me, but Jill was not wrong. Cecil points out:
So, statistically speaking, Kinsey’s results were not from a fair sampling.
Larry:
If mere physical manipulation was all it required to make a sexual organ larger, then every male on the face of the planet would be hung like an elephant.
