No, that is the point that you have completely, utterly, and totally failed to make, despite hundreds of attempts.
Let’s be clear here. From a purely scientific, biological point of view, the following statements are most likely true, meaning that I think most biologists would accept them without demanding proof:
-there are at least some genetic differences between racial groups, even if they are no more than those responsible for the superficial phenotypic differences.
-it is likely that some of the variation in intelligence amongst human beings is at least partially genetic in nature.
-the causes of the full variation in intelligence are likely to be numerous and varied, including socioeconomic variation and cultural pressures.
Let us accept, for the sake of argument, that every word you have said in this thread is the gospel truth. I can’t be more generous than that. Even accepting that, what has not ever been proven - indeed, what you have completely failed to provide ANY evidence for, are these statements:
-The observed differences in intelligence between racial groups are genetic in nature. That is, the influence of genetic variation overwhelms the effects of other non-genetic factors.
And this, I think, is the most important one:
-The genetic variation underlying the variation in intelligence levels segregates with and correlates to the genetic variation underlying phenotypic racial differences.
In other words, you have in no way even tried to provide evidence that the differences you claim to see everywhere you look is genetic in nature. And even if it IS genetic, you have no evidence at ALL that those genetic differences are confined within racial lines.
Now, from a scientist’s point of view, here’s what you would need to do. Start delving into any of the many published databases of genetic variation. The HapMap project would be a good place to start, as they have mapped millions of SNPs across a wide range of ethnic populations. You would need to do a genome-wide association study to identify specific genetic changes that correlate to higher or lower intelligence (we’ll ignore, for the moment, the overlooked fact that no one takes IQ tests at all seriously in the biological world). These changes are unlikely to be causative, but they would identify regions of interest within the genome that could be studied more in-depth.
Once you’ve found a few dozen candidate genes that may be influencing intelligence, you’d have to investigate what those genes do, and where and when they’re expressed, hoping that they’d at least be important in the brain. Once you’ve identified specific alleles of specific genes, you’d have to then do some population genetics to show that those alleles segregate within racial lines.
Until and unless that work is done (and, to be clear, I suspect it would fall apart completely somewhere along the way, showing that those associations do not exist), NOTHING HAS BEEN PROVEN. We don’t know anything for sure, and you don’t either. You can point to your little studies all you want, but none of them show anything more than correlation - and as people keep showing, the majority don’t even do that much. You cannot dissect out correlation from causation without experimental evidence that simply does not exist.