I know, I know - because white men are all a bunch of racists and sexists who don’t care about anything except preserving their privileges so we should just ignore what they say!
Do I get an A, professor?
I know, I know - because white men are all a bunch of racists and sexists who don’t care about anything except preserving their privileges so we should just ignore what they say!
Do I get an A, professor?
You don’t know what someone else has experienced.
Coward.
Are you kidding? Me? They threw me out. I was just too damn smart and clever and charming.
How many people these days are actually white straight Christian undisabled males? 20%? That’s why I figure that by necessity we’re going to have to expand the definition of white(again) to include white Hispanics. If there aren’t enough white males, the “system” won’t work anymore!
How about we just ditch “White” altogether. Its not so much a defined group as the lack of it. “White” is everybody who doesn’t have a distinctive characteristic. Why bother? Being a Cubs fan says more about you than being “White”, which doesn’t say much about you at all.
It DOES say that you only have a very limited number of World Series championships tto reminisce about…
THen the system really breaks down. No whites, no oppressors.
This has been my experience. It’s not ‘oh you used transsexual instead of transgender, I hate you now’, it’s more like ‘how dare you use cisgendered to refer to people that aren’t transgendered’ or ‘I’m going to keep calling a trans woman a ‘man in a dress’ even though you’ve pointed out that’s both not accurate and deliberately insulting’.
I’ve never actually heard anyone even ask someone to use either of those. The only time I’ve heard them is when conservatives use them as an example of something unreasonable. I’m sure there was some fringe college group that pressed for them at one time, but can you point to any sources supporting a widespread campaign for the use of either of those terms instead of disabled?
Except that it IS hard for his kind to shrug off even the most mild of ‘persecution’. Remember, when the mean old federal government gets all persecuty that you have to treat pre-teens politely, the acorns of people like him prompt them to start making death threats. At six ear olds. This happened back during integration, and is happening now for trans kids being treated as the correct gender in schools.
And no, I don’t consider anyone who is making death threats against six year olds, or anyone who takes their side, to be at all tough. But that’s what the ‘anti-PC’ crowd does
BPC actually only called out what stringbean’s experience wasn’t. And based on bis self-description as a young white male, it’s not unfair to predict that BPC was on the money.
Sure, if a person’s life is defined by their group membership. We can draw conclusions about groups based on group characteristics, but we cannot predict individual behaviors or experiences based on group characteristics. Some minorities have led charmed lives, some white males have never gotten a fair shake.
If that was a response to my post, nonsense. BPC’s list in post 50 was made up of specific unjust experiences that are simply not applicable to young straight white males.
Getting called mean names is not a serious social disadvantage. Those words have power because the victims give them power. THe names people call white males have no power because white males refuse to acknowledge them.
Why do you think white males are unique in this capacity?
They aren’t. Being bulletproof when someone calls you names is a hallmark of successful people in general. Slurs like “mick”, “guinea” and “kike” used to have power. Now they barely nick the intended victim.
And let’s not forget that Ralph Nader himself is not white. He’s Arab.
And we’ve got all that money! Sure wish I could remember where I put it, that shit is handy!
Experience of male victims of Domestic Violence is similar to the experience of slaves. The law almost never protects them.
Some of my ancestors were slaves in Russia 1828 – 1858.
I respect this for it contains considerable truth.
I still think words only hurt the weak.
Except the words are a vocal ecpression of real world discrimination.
Exactly. The discrimination is the problem, not the verbal expression of it.