You often see things written like “One fission event will cause other nuclei to fission. Which in turn cause more nuclei to fission.”
The first “fission” is fine. The other two seem like really poor English to non-physicist non-grammarian me. “Fiss” seems a much more logical way to construct that part of speech.
Yes indeed … this is what started the family argument in the first place … I think there’s two uranium deposits in The Gabon where the [sup]235[/sup]U:[sup]238[/sup]U ratio is below what is found in all other uranium deposits … implying at some point in the past there was enough pressure to allow superspliticallity …
Interesting … would the past participle of to fiss be fuss or would we use the impassive splot … as in “Once all the plutonium fuss that was able to splot, we were done with the experiment.”