Reading Style: Is It OCD Not to Want to Miss Anything?

When I pleasure-read, I feel like I have to understand every reference, every concept before moving forward. I *often *go back and re-read previous paragraphs if I find my mind has wandered, if I can’t remember exactly who the mentioned character is, or if I don’t understand something. I can’t skim a novel, nor do I really want to. I have trouble trusting that “everything will become clear” if I just move forward. I enjoy language and don’t want to read solely for content, either.

Needless to say, I’m a slow reader. I don’t have learning disabilities; in fact, I taught myself to read early, and I have a strongly visual memory which helped me study for tests because I mentally turned the page to the location of the information, then read it off the mental page. I took Evelyn Wood when I was 12, did well with it, but didn’t enjoy it. I’m frustrated because my appetite for reading is much greater than my ability to consume it.

Does anyone else have this reading style? Has it gotten worse over time? Do you try to overcome it?

Not looking for a medical diagnosis, just wondering about others who read this way.

I don’t mean to nitpick, but as someone who has lived with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder for the past twenty-something years, I’ve noticed that this term seems to have seeped into the general lexicon to now make reference to lots of different kinds of seemingly “picky” or fastidious behaviors that may have nothing to do with OCD.

Not giving medical advice here - but if this is the sole habit you’ve noticed, I’d guess (in my opinion) reading comprehension style rather than Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

*The usual disclaimer applies - not a doctor or in any way qualified to make a diagnosis - this is just based upon my experience and observations. Carry on! :slight_smile:

I remember when reading when I was a teenager looking up every word in a dictionary in a novel I did not understand. It helped me expand my vocab considerably. I do not really have to do that now. But I recently read Adrian Mole - the Cappuccino years, and found that I had to look up the references to many British terms and people.

Electrical Storm, my use of the term OCD was due primarily to lack of space in the title for Obsessive or Compulsive, which many people have tendencies toward. I meant no harm. Please forgive me.

No, I have the opposite problem. When I’m getting into a book, I may skip things – sentences, even whole paragraphs – because I want the book to move forward. Sometimes it’s an effort for me to slow down and actually read the whole thing. And this is with books that I like!

I have the same problem as the OP. After seeing the Lord of the Rings films I really wanted to read the books. I however got so entrenched in keeping track of names, places, passing of time, etc. that I never even made it to Rivendell.
Any time a character dropped a name I had to page back chapters to remember where I had heard it before and what significance it played.

Exactly. Because if I miss something, then I’m afraid I’ll be totally lost somewhere ahead. The effort of keeping all the names and relationships straight really interferes with the pleasure of the story.

You can see why I don’t read Martin’s ASoIaF, Erikson’s Malazan books, and I’ll never finish Jacqueline Carey’s Kushiel books.

So, does it keep you from reading certain books, from reading at all, or do you overcome or compensate for it somehow?

When I read for pleasure I often make sure I read every line, but if there’s a reference I don’t get I may or may not skip it. I might puzzle about it for a minute, but then just mentally shrug and move on. Since this is my normal reading style, if I pick up a book that’s not very engaging, I often have to remind myself that I’m not enjoying catching every word, and force myself to… well, let’s just say read faster. I don’t really skim it (unless the writing is bad-- and if it is, the story has to be good or I just drop the book), but I sort of mentally gear myself to not hang on the author’s every word. It gives me less of a sense of tone, because when my reading speeds up I sacrifice sort of mentally hearing the voices in the book read to me.

[hijack] I just have to note, though I might get some flack for it, that LOTR had some boring, boring parts in them, with not so great writing. Tolkein was not a poet, much as he wanted to be, and when he started in on songs I couldn’t even bring myself to read the whole thing. This also happened when the characters talked about how hungry they were. Bilbo starts thinking of his well-stocked pantry at home, and I almost audibly groan and start skimming. I think I was most disappointed because The Hobbit had none of this dreck, and was a pleasure from start to finish.[/hijack]

I do sometimes make notes of things to look up later, particularly when reading historical fiction, but it doesn’t interfere with my enjoyment of the book. Usually I can trust the author to remind me of who a previously introduced character is, and to make sure that a missed reference won’t spoil the plot of the book.

Personally, I think if a book is written well, a character that’s mentioned once on page 4 will get just enough exposition the next time he’s mentioned on page 543 so you can go ‘oh yeah, that guy!’ instead of having to go find the reference. Robert Jordan, for all his writing faults, wasn’t too bad about this.

When I’m reading for pleasure, I read much too fast. Frequently I’ll only catch about one sentence per paragraph, particularly if there’s not much going on plotwise. Sometimes I’ll catch myself and realize I don’t really know what’s happening, and I’ll back up to go over that portion again. Often, though, I don’t realize I missed something and happily plow ahead.

I don’t mind this too much because I have a habit of rereading books, and frequently I’ll pick things up on the second or third reading that I missed previous times. I find it’s more fun that way. :slight_smile: This happens more with dense writers like Tolkien and Jordan.

Since we’re talking about reading styles, may I bring up something that has long bothered me. It’s not about reading ordinary books. It’s about reading the Sunday comics.

When I read the Sunday comics, I always reread each strip (that I read at all – I skip some of them). When I get to the last panel, my eyes automatically dart back to the first panel and read the strip as though I’ve never read it before. I can even begin the strip with a determination not to do that, but I do it anyway. It drives me crazy (if I’m not already there).

Does anyone else do that? It doesn’t happen with shorter daily strips or with strips I read on the internet (even if they’re Sunday strips).

No worries- no harm, no foul. And in retrospect I think I came across a little touchy, so an apology from my side as well. Carry on! :slight_smile:

You’re a very good reader. Good readers DO go back if their minds were daydreaming. Good readers do go back if they forgot who a character is.

Reading speed isn’t that critical as long as you are a fluent reader (i.e., you read in phrases and sentences, you can do proper intonation of the narrator and characters, and you can pronounce 97% of the words correctly).

You will have different experiences with different texts, too. Fiction vs. nonfiction, of course, but also if you have good background knowledge for what you are reading, then reading will be much easier.

I experience what you are experiencing usually for the first 25-50 pages or so. After that, my brain is pretty much in tune with the characters and plot.

I have tons more to say, but, really, as long as you enjoy reading, then don’t worry about it.

I’m interested in what else you have to say. I sure wouldn’t want to miss anything. :wink:

I agree with your last line, Runs with Scissors, but not the first. I don’t know if that style of reading makes the OP a “very good reader” or not. The phrasing, “very good” is off-putting. Does that mean that the readers who trust the author to throw in a remark to remind readers who a character is are “bad readers?” What about the ones who have no problem with re-reading a book after it’s over to fully understand it? That’s how I treat several books (and video games for that matter)–the first time is for the twist, the second is to see how the twist is foreshadowed and how things make more sense with the twist in mind.

I’m with Wolfian, **Runs with Scissors’ ** opening line is far too strong.

No problem with wonderlust’s reading style, whetever suits you, but saying this style makes you a “good reader” seems to imply those who have a different technique - read quickly, trust it will make sense as the author explains more, reread later - are not “good” readers. Whatever that means.

Right, I read primarily for entertainment. Maybe a touch of escapism. Rarely for education. So it doesn’t really bother me if I do miss some stuff. If I know I’m missing stuff, I may go back and re-read–and sometimes with books in series I’ll read the new book and then go back and re-read the older books in the series, or at least my favorite bits. (I also like to re-read bits of favorite books just to enjoy character development, dialogue, and foreshadowing).

I’m struggling to read a Dan Brown novel right now. First of all, something happened on about page 5 for which I was reluctant to suspend disbelief. Second of all, I’m not sure how much of the historical stuff Brown includes is made up and how much of it is more or less scholarly. And I’m not interested enough in the subject at hand to wish to research it myself. And finally, Brown has this tendency to veer between “It’s impossible” and “It’s obvious” with highly dramatic events occuring every three pages for 24 hours or so. It drives me bonkers. So we’ll see if I ever finish the book or not.

I’ll try again. This will probably sound like I’m a weaseling flip flopper, but, hey, I’m not running for president!

The OP asked about reading, and I took that literally. In other words, there is a difference between “reading” and “comprehending.” Wanderlust seems to have no trouble with comprehension, and when I said Wanderlust is a good reader, I meant that Wanderlust has good reading skills.

Of course, comprehension is the main goal in reading. What researchers have discovered is that people who comprehend well have certain reading skills. Here are some of the basics.

First, you must have sufficient background knowledge of the subject. The fancy word for this is “schema.” Your schema is made up of everything you have ever read, everything you have ever experienced, and so on. The more you know about a particular topic, the easier it will be to read. Here is a great example. Read the following paragraph:

The procedure is actually quite simple. First you arrange things into different groups. Of course, one pile may be sufficient depending on how much there is to do. If you have to go somewhere else due to lack of facilities, that is the next step, otherwise you are pretty well set. It is important not to overdo things. That is, it is better to do too few things rather than too many. In the short run this may not seem important but complications can easily arise. A mistake can be expensive as well. At first the whole procedure will seem complicated. Soon, however, it will become just another facet of life. It is difficult to foresee any end to the necessity for this task in the immediate future, but then one can never tell. After the procedure is completed one arranges the materials in groups again. Then they can be put into their appropriate places. Eventually they will be used once more and the whole cycle will have to be repeated. However, this is part of life.

If you are like most people, you “read” it but you didn’t “comprehend” it. Now, read what’s in the spoiler box and go back and re-read it.

This time when you read it, think about doing laundry.

Now that you have the correct “schema,” you can comprehend it as if it were a Dr. Seuss book.

What are some of the other skills good readers use? They ask questions. They can be on the literal level: What does that mean? Or they can be questions that you will find the answers to if you keep reading, or they might be questions that are not answered directly by the text. Good readers constantly ask questions, and make predictions (based on their schemas). The really important part of this strategy is that you are an engaged reader. This will help that lovely phenomenon of reading an entire page of text…only to discover you were thinking about something else and you have no idea what you just read. But you did read it.

Good readers make inferences. Not everything is spelled out by the author, and you have to figure out what things mean. I think this can be one of the trickiest things. One thing that helps you infer is by having a picture in your head. This is one way I test comprehension for my students. Not every 10-year-old can explain to me their level of comprehension, especially learning disabled students. But quite often they can draw what happened, and that helps me understand their perception (or misconception) of what was read.

Another good skill is to synthesize the information. In other words, take the information from what was read, add it to your schema, then come up with a new insight about…well, anything.

There’s more, but it’s a snow day and I don’t have to teach today! Woot!

And a really, really, good reader would have noticed that the OP’s name is wonderlust. :wink: