(bolding mine)
keep in mind that hunting also requires skill, if you’re a novice hunter go with somebody experience and good at it, and try to learn from them. I used to hunt every year. When I turned 18 Dad gave me a 7mm bolt action and single shot break action 20gauge shotgun and told me from now on I had to pay for my own hunting. I quit after a few years because I am an awesome hunter, but suck at finding any game to bag. Money for gas, bringing lunch, hunting license and game tags, ammunition, adds up pretty quick for a walk in the wilds.
I think a .30-06 is ideal for a beginner deer hunter, I’d go with a Winchester Model 70.
I personally use a Remington Model 7 in 7mm Remington Ultra Mag, but would not recommend it for a beginner hunter. For one you do not need the range as a beginner hunter, as you should not take long shots if you are not supremely confident you can humanely kill the animal at great range. For two, last time I stocked up .30-06 was about 50% cheaper than 7mm UM.
For a beginner, I’d hesitate to go with a full-up .30-06. It can be a bit of a beast in a lightweight rifle. The .308 Win has very similar terminal ballistics, while still being a lighter, handier round in general. You can take most north american game with a .308, and realistically, what are the odds he’ll be hunting brown bears, grizzlies, or bison? Anything less than will fall quite nicely to a .308.
That said, I’d agree that .270 or similar load would also be just fine.
Don’t much like the 7.62x39 as a hunting cartridge - it’s got balistics similar to the .30-30. Not entirely unsuitable, but not anywhere near my first choice.
yeah, I agree. When I hunted, I started out at age 12 with a 7mm because thats what Dad had. I spent that summer target shooting a minimum of 20 rounds once a week just to get used to it and proficient with it before going out and actually hunting.
Yet another owner of a M-77, this one in .270 Win. My experiences fall between yours and Crafter_Man’s. I like the thing, and it’s taken a few deer, but I’m not in love with it. It does have noticeable recoil, but then again, so will anything sufficient to easily handle deer. Mine is not a tack driver—maybe 1.5 MOA?—but it is sufficient for deer at any range I have business shooting them at. It was improved by a glass bedding/stock re-finishing job, which is a bit more work than a new shooter may want to do.
Though I know a .22-250 can take deer, I wouldn’t go lighter than a .243 Winchester. Personal preference. A nice thing about .270, and .308 and .-06 is that you can find ammo just about anywhere in the USA.
Definitely go heavier than lighter. A flinch, if you get one, is a PITA to get rid of. (Guiltily raises hand). And how much walking are you going to do, anyway? It’s not like you’re elk hunting…
one grandpa across the street from my brother’s house owns three winchester pre-64 m-70 rifles, all in 30-06 and all in great shape (one with a lyman target sight, one in military peep and one with a weaver variable.) i suppose the degree of separation puts me far down the inheritance order. one, even just one!