Basically, Blake had misinterpreted the observation that, for a given design of animal, increasing its size will not increase the height it can jump. But cats are not designed like people, so it is hardly surprising that they can jump higher.
Satellite pictures? It’s right there on my globe? It’s got its own wikipedia entry?
The general point stands, though. We all routinely accept anecdotal claims, and there’s nothing essentially wrong with it, provided they don’t strain credulity/are in conflict with the known laws of physics/in any way contradict how we understand the way the world works/have a suspicious context. In quite a lot of cases, it will be the only evidence you have/can conceivably acquire for a certain claim.
For instance, if your dear old aunt Agatha claims to have been mugged last week after collecting her pension check, you won’t cry “cite?”, but rather “that bastard!” (provided your aunt doesn’t regularly try to exhort money from you using fabrications like that).
If, however, ol’ auntie claims to have seen a UFO piloted by the ghost of her dear deceased hubbie Ben, you’d be justified in assuming that she’s maybe going a little funny in the head.
Having read through the thread, I’d say that Blake ought to have accepted what he claimed to be mere anecdotes, but only because his own cites didn’t back him strongly enough, referring, as they did, to a general issue of scale versus jumping height, discounting the effect of muscle and bone structure.
I am however a bit disappointed that Mangetout apparently never carried out his proposed experiment.
I’m not seeing the bald assertions, just a whole lot of “I might be wrong, could you show me?”, and nor am I seeing him claiming people imagine things, just that he doesn’t accept anecdotal evidence.
Like I said, I believed cats could jump higher all along. I didn’t have a problem with that. But I would never expect anyone else to accept something just because I said it was so, and I certainly wouldn’t call them a fool for not doing so.
No, I only read the first half or so this time around, and I don’t remember how far I kept up with it five years ago.
Hah! Now that’s just brilliant. Kudos on the boat, looks like it was quite a piece of work, and it turned out well!
You’re absolved of my accusations of experimental neglect. For what it’s worth.
But not this one. Anecdotal evidence is at this level of credibility. It’s the whole point of using cites, and the scientific method, and all that good stuff.
Even though cites eventually started appearing, what I’m seeing is still over 150 posts of one guy posting cites and asking for countercites and lots of people presenting anecdotal evidence, and the mood somehow turning on the first guy.
By the way that’s an F1 Savannah Cat ( 1rst generation hybrid of a domestic cat and a Serval ), so I wouldn’t necessarily call it representative of your average housecat.
No it isn’t - unless you’re using some kind of weird boolean version of credibility.
“I, and a number of my friends, have seen cats jump really quite surprisingly high” is not by any means the same class of claim as “I saw Elvis alive and well, working in BK” - it just isn’t.
But That’s not really the point of this thread at all; the point of this thread is exactly as follows:
We, that endured scorn and derision regarding our personal observations of the jumping ability of cats were not actually wrong.
In this particular case, the anecdotes, however much they are supposed to be despised, were in fact accurate - they were in fact observations of reality.
I have no problem with anyone saying “look, that just sounds wrong, can you back it up?”, but you can take this ‘plural of anecdotes’ business too far - as I believe it was indeed taken in the linked thread.
It’s a shame that other thread is five years old, otherwise it might have been apposite to invite Blake to conduct an empirical scientific experiment.
I would suggest a harness arrangement by which a naked Blake could be suspended horizontally from the ceiling in the centre of a completely empty room. Pilchards would then be fastened to his groinal area, and the harness would be adjusted so that this area was the lowest point of his body, and precisely six feet above the floor. A hungry and athletic cat, with really sharp claws, would then be introduced into the room.
I feel sure that Blake, backed up by every university professor in the land, would have volunteered with every confidence.
Well, I can’t say it looked that way from my point of view, but some of that impression doubtless comes from the other times Blake has stubbornly and aggressively pulled the same trick on me (and was wrong those times too).