Ensuring the federal government isn’t doing good for their state is an important part of ensuring their mantra that the Feds are a useless obstruction to be shut down remains believable to their low-information audiences.
They may not have access to your upscale dumpsters with air fresheners installed. On the other hand (the one that hasn’t been severed) I hear that there are fans in slaughterhouses, and there’s always the chance to snag a bit of Great Plains Sushi.
I prepared a thread on this for Politics and Elections and discovered I was a month too late. h/t Discourse. Here’s the rant, which broadens the topic somewhat.
15 Republican Governors agree: poor kids eat too much and our state economy is too strong. Part of a trend.
GOP governors refuse federal aid for grocery assistance during the summer, a program worked out during the 2022 bipartisan budget agreement. This wasn’t an issue of state budgeting: they just don’t like the idea of feeding kids: it’s welfare you know and children don’t vote. Owners of grocery stores, farmer’s markets, and other approved retailers do vote, but that’s not enough to persuade 15 Republican governors. Nor is their state economy important to them: otherwise they wouldn’t turn down this federal aid.
This is part of a broader trend. Traditional conservatives like Nelson Rockefeller believed in progress, but felt that government programs should be designed carefully, taking time to cross t’s and dot i’s. There’s a legitimate debate around the generosity of the safety net at the federal level: the US’s is less generous than other high income advanced economies, but hard right Reaganauts believed the US should cut welfare spending more.
But Reaganauts never turned down federal aid at the state level. Nor did John Kasich of Ohio. To advocate that takes you further right, into the reactionary zone. As Adam Serwer said, "The Cruelty is the Point". Even today, 10 Republican states have turned down Medicare Expansion, though it would be funded approximately 90% by the Feds. Perhaps they think their state economy is too strong, which is odd since all of them baring Texas and Wyoming are below average in terms of Gross State Product per person. It turns out that if you want to keep someone in a ditch, you have to climb into a ditch with them.
I’m an optimist: it can always get worse. Beyond reactionary are those who don’t believe in democracy or free and fair elections but do like scapegoating certain minority groups. Call them neo-fascist, with the neo prefix being optional. Think Mussolini or Viktor Orbán.
Beyond neo-fascist are those who engage in eliminationist rhetoric. That puts you on a road to genocide.
And beyond that are those who act on eliminationist rhetoric at a large scale basis, affecting hundreds of thousands or more. Nazis. We’re not there yet.
But back to the thread title. Here’s a list of states that turned down aid for hungry kids: all have Republican governors.
Alabama - Governor Kay Ivey
Alaska - Governor Mike Dunleavy
Florida - Governor Ron DeSantis
Georgia - Governor Brian Kemp
Idaho - Governor Brad Little
Iowa - Governor Kim Reynolds
Louisiana - Governor Jeff Landry
Mississippi - Governor Tate Reeves
Oklahoma (though not 3 sovereign tribal areas) - Governor Kevin Stitt
South Carolina - Governor Henry McMaster
South Dakota - Governor Kristi Noem
Texas - Governor Greg Abbott
Vermont (the hell?) - Governor Phil Scott
Wyoming - Governor Mark Gordon