Republican Senator Tries To Add Conception Amendment To Flood Insurance Bill

OK, then, compulsory sterilization for Republicans.

Thanks for the correction.

No problem!

And if its the realllllly clean kind Jesus shows up.

He could walk there, rest of us have to swim.

[QUOTE=Rand Paul, Constitutional Scholar]
“Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be ‘constitutional’ does not make it so. The whole thing remains unconstitutional.”
[/QUOTE]

Yeah, what the hell gives the Supreme Court the authority to decide what’s constitutional or not?

Be fair, now. The Court’s rulings on constitutionality are definitive, but can still be fairly called wrong.

This is what happens when you don’t teach kids about condensation at school.

Quote: Johnny Angel

Stay classy, Repubs!

I’d be okay with it so long as it included some funding for the perverted arts as well.

Technically the quote is accurate. It takes **more **than a couple of them to determine whether something is constitutional or not.

I’m SURE that’s what he meant :slight_smile:

All in favor of the amended Springfield-slash-pervert bill?

Wait, so am I voting on Rand Paul/Flood slash fiction now?

Brought to mind this scene from The Simpsons, when Springfield was menaced by a comet:

Wish I’d thought of that! :wink:

Yeah, I realized too late that I’d only done a search for the keyword “simpsons” to see if someone had mentioned it. Alas, subtle jokery has gutted me again.

As long as you remember to deluge when you’re having that not-so-fresh feeling.

You should have searched for the keywords “perverted arts”, as I do for every page on the internet.

Themselves, as per Marbury vs. Madison. Bloody law types, with their suppression of the real 13th amendment and all that.