So I was talking with WordWoman last night, debating whether the remake of the Thomas Crown Affair was a Chick Flick - me: Yes; her: No. I came up with the following definitions:
Both Chick Flicks and Guy Flicks are films that simplify characters and plots - there are Good Guys and Bad Guys and the plot revolves around Achieving a Goal. But with a Guy Flick, the goal is about achieving something, whereas with a Chick Flick, the goal is about winning someone. This is an obvious over-simplification - in Guy Flicks, the hero gets a lover or final victory over childhood pain as icing on the cake quite often; and in Chick Flicks, the hero often achieves material success as well as falling in love, making peace with friends or parents, etc…but you get the idea.
With that in mind, I argue that the TCA remake is a Chick Flick because the most important thing at the end of the film is Rene Russo deciding whether she can trust TCrown (Brosnan) and find emotional fulfillment through that trust, NOT whether the painting is returned (which is more of a tricky bit of filming than a real resolution).
What do you think - both about the Guy Flick = something vs. Chick Flick = someone definitions and about whether the TCA remake is a chick flick?
Two caveats:
-
I did a search on the SDMB for this and couldn’t find anything - yet I could’ve sworn I contributed to a dicussion on this - perhaps it was during the Great Void…
-
No offense intended by the phrases Guy Flick or Chick Flick - just trying to use easy-to-understand phrases. I happen to be a big fan of well-done versions of either genre…