Prayer, again. No direct evidence of specifically what’s going on there. (Heck, we can’t even pinpoint how hypnosis works!). But outcomes. The outcomes aren’t necessarily ephemeral. I would not incorporate “prayer” as an explanation of phenomena if there were no phenomena to explain.
My religion has no base tenets. Aside from the paradoxical base tenet about fallibility and uncertainty. Well, OK, perhaps an implicit sense that there is meaning and sense to be made of it all in the first place, that there is a “there there”. But any enterprise has the implicit mission-statement sense that those who participate in it do so under the assumption that doing so is not meaningless, yes?
Me neither. Who invoked him?
I am not responsible for religions in general, many other religions, or any other religions. Most of them are taxidermy: the process of becoming and existing as institutions has long since killed off the live curiosity-and-inquiry core, the original “wanting answers” thing, and they stick the stuffed and mounted corpse of some ancient book of answers or visionary prophet-leader up front and say “Behold”.