Every state of the Union imposes requirements for driver’s licences. Shouldn’t purchasing or operating a fire-arm also require credential? (I realize some will say “Driving a car is a privilege; carrying a lethal weapon is a right;” start another thread if that’s as far as you get in your thinking.)
I don’t want the Federal government to impose rules for gun credentials; I’m happy to leave it, like drivers’ licenses, up to each state. If Alabama grants a license to purchase or carry fire-arms to any citizen at least 12 years of age, that’s fine. If Oregon decides that gun owners need to pass a course in gun safety and pass a background check before they can purchase or carry a fire-arm, that’s fine too.
Each state will make a list showing which states’ gun licenses it accepts. If Oregon does not accept Alabama gun licenses, then an Alabaman who visits Oregon will have to leave his weapon at home, or obtain an Oregon license. This is somewhat similar to the present rules on drivers’ licenses. The Federal government will play no role (except perhaps for apprehending people who transport a gun across a state line without a valid license for each state).
This should appeal to both liberals and states’ rights conservatives. If Alabaman schoolchildren still feel unsafe, they (or their parents) need to petition Alabama’s legislature.
As I mentioned in a recent thread, saving the lives of a few dozen schoolchildren (in states which adopt meaningful licensing) is a worthy goal, but more important is to expose the flaws in Trumpism and Pence-Ryanism. If the Pence-Trump regime can be overthrown, many tens of thousands of lives will be saved annually due to issues unrelated to guns, e.g. healthcare and environmental protection.
Trump has reversed himself: In 2016 he (correctly) thought that arming schoolteachers was a bad idea. Now he’s for it. The more I think about it, the more it becomes clear that Trump’s plan is unusually stupid, even by Trump’s standards.
For one thing, with 3 million schoolteachers in the country, even if 99.99% behave responsibly with their guns (or turn down the gun-toting opportunity altogether), that leaves 300 teachers who may blunder: e.g. drawing their weapon in a discipline situation where no student gun is present. We know many trained police officers have seriously flawed gun behavior — 300 inappropriately armed schoolteachers is probably a severe underestimate.
In my plan, schoolteachers are not armed. States who want, say, metal detectors in schools, or background checks for gun holders, can have them. States who don’t, won’t. Happy-happy. Win-win.
The incompetence of Trumpist and Republican ideas will be on display for all to see. “Conservative” hypocrisy — pretending to believe in states’ rights but actually wanting to impose the NRA agenda on blue states — will be exposed as insincere prattle. Win-win.