What I’m seeing a lot of is like the self-righteous types who couldn’t scramble to their keyboards fast enough to blame Bush and the U.S. for their “shameful” and “pathetic” response to the tsunami (which didn’t take place in America, BTW). The U.S. ended kicking in what most people (except those who think we need a systemic redistributive transfer of wealth to the Third World on general principle) would agree was an ample, generous, in some cases excessive (as in, incapable of saving any marginal lives, as in, we read stories of relief workers without a whole lot of relief work that needed doing) response in terms of manpower, money, and materiel.
I’ve been through a Category 5 hurricane. I know the unpredictability of these things – a storm that’s churning with 70 mile winds toward Miami one day can be menacing Galveston, or the Yucatan, or Pensacola, with 160 mph winds 36 hours later (not too different to what happened with Katrina). You can’t post a ton of materiel and soldiers in every city on the coast. You may prepare for one thing, and get another (in Andrew, the evacuation and preparation were directed largely to flooding, of which there was very little, but not to intense wind). It’s difficult to imagine, till you’ve seen it, just how hard it is to assess damage and triage and plan for response in inherently-unique circumstances coming from each disaster. But, be that as it may. We will posit that there are “adequate responses” and “inadequate responses.”
So my GD here is not over whether the “Bush response” to Katrina was or will be “adequate” (and I don’t want to get down in the gutter with freaks who want to think that Bush has forced blacks to resort to systemic cannibalism). I don’t even want to debate whether the fed. govt is “supposed to” prevent or cure every harm from natural disasters.
I just think past experience indicates that those of us who are not actually in moment-to-moment command of disaster response (these people might hence have a real immediate need to find fault and address it in the short term) do not need to, and cannot with accuracy or fairness, begin assessing, lauding, damning, or flouncing about in moral superiority, with respect to the adequacy and good-intentions and could-we-have-done-better issues in a particular disaster. So – can we suspend judgment for – let us say – 10 days? Yes, we need to monitor our public officials but, really, most of of us are not disaster relief experts, civil engineers, or epidemiologists, and our kneejerk reactions are neither likely to be helpful nor particularly informative. That, at least, is my proposed conclusion.