McDonald’s I’m sure is better - I was ecstatic when I heard they were doing all day breakfast, that alone makes it better. Still, I don’t go there as often as I used to. I can get better food paying just a little more at a local mom and pop shop than their standard fare stuff. Their standard fare is NOT cheap anymore. I’ll occasionally swing by there for a McDouble or something else off their value meal when I’m looking for something quick and cheap.
The converted house by San Jose State was the original. It was so small they only had room for a couple picnic tables outside so almost every thing was to go, hence the name. I ate there many times but moved away and missed them. When I moved to Mesa there were two franchises, one by me and one in north Scottsdale and I rejoiced. Then the one by me closed and twenty miles is a long ways to go for a sandwich. Then that one closed as well and that was that.
Togo’s? Memory slosh. Wife reminded me between those posts. But I don’t recall the local Quizno’s she likes, either. Maybe I do a “suppress memory” thing. Like I try to forget being poisoned at Crap-In-The-Box aka Scarf-n-Barf.
I think I remember this county’s McFoods. Three Subways. Two Mountain Mike’s. One each McD’s, BurgerThing, Domino’s, KFC/TacoSmell, JimBoy’s, Togo’s, Perko’s, Baskin-Robbins, and Carl’s. No other chains at all. This county is just not worth the investment.
One thing that stands out in my memory of the place on William St. was the 1st King Crimson album cover they had on the wall with the caption “I said NO PEPPERS!”
The second San Jose Togo’s location was in a converted house too, on Campbell Ave. They moved it across the street to the Pruneyard and the house is now a Thai place.
A better deal, but is the quality better? I doubt it.
Similarly, I grew up around the area from which Subway restaurants originated and I remember the food tasting much better in the 1970s and 1980s. I just found someone on eBay selling a Subway menu that’s about thirty years old, and the foot-long sandwiches were four or five dollars back then. Using an online inflation calculator, they should be nine or ten bucks today but they’re about six or seven bucks.
In the ‘standard fast food chains’, I think that since the 90s McDonald’s has stayed about the same (with some better quality things on the menu at various points), Burger King’s fries got worse but burgers got better, Wendy’s quality dropped a lot, and Hardees/Carl Jr improved quality and consistency quite a bit. Arby’s upped their quality and hugely expanded their menu. Taco Bell upped their quality and has jostled their menu a lot. Their relative prices seem to have gone up, I remember ‘fast food’ as being significantly cheaper than ‘fast casual’ or ‘table service lunch, minus the tip’, but now unless you milk the value menu it will be about the same. Taco Bell is especially noteworthy on the price increase, it used to be that they were by far the cheapest place to go with things like 10 tacos for $1 but now they’re about the same price as everyone else.
I agree, Little Caesar’s in the 90s was ‘pretty good compared to the other guys and cheaper’ now they’re going for ‘cheap and fast’. I like what they do reasonably well - they’re not great pizza, but they’re not bad and have the best price to quality ratio of anyone. But they’ve definitely reduced quality from what they did in the past to reduce price.
One that’s a California chain you might want to check out the next time you’re in Santa Cruz is Ike’s Love and Sandwiches on Ocean St. I first encountered them in Davis and was really pleased when the opened one here. Good selection of decent bread and great sandwiches.
We got one of those, a little expensive but they’re big. And the sandwich names get kind of painful to say. Each store has their own unique menu (with overlap).
Not really stupid, more like named after celebrities and pro athletes that play for regional teams. You can order by number as well, but I don’t mind ordering the Matt Cain or the Paul Reuben, as examples. It wouldn’t stop me from eating there.
Domino’s is/was well known in marketing circles, for actually listening to their customers, and making a significant change based on that, and successfully refreshing their business.
The change they made was to make their pizzas more typically crappy American-style fast-food style. That is, sweeter. Like their customers wanted. They didn’t use those terms to describe their new recipe: they don’t want to insult their customers. The just say that they’d listened to their customers and that the customers liked the new recipe.
That does not sound right to me at all. The main difference between their old and new pizzas was their crust. They used to be awful. Now they’re tolerable. Their sauce? I don’t know. I remember it as being very sweet before, and I feel like it’s less sweet now, but I wouldn’t swear by that, as that’s not the essential difference between the old pizza and the new one.