The case for invading Iraq to remove its weapons of mass destruction was based on selective use of intelligence, exaggeration, use of sources known to be discredited and outright fabrication, The Independent on Sunday can reveal.
Rest of article deleted, see below - CF
WE ARE AGAINST WAR, DESTROYING & KILLINGN IN ANY PLACE … EVEN AT AMERICA ITSELFE …
Inssanah, you are clearly new hear so I will gently remind you that you cannot quote too much of a copyrighted material. A small part with a link is OK, but too much is prohibited. No worries, a mod will be along to edit your post shortly.
Inssanah, knock it the fuck off. First of all, familiarise yourself with our rules. Posting copyrighted articles in their entirety is not allowed on this message board. Look up what “fair use” means, please.
Secondly, your trick is getting pretty stale. We get it. You’re against the war on Iraq. You’ll find that many people on these boards are, as well. But if you post one more meaningless thread or post (i.e. just a ripped off article without any added substance), you’re out of here.
We appreciate all points of view, and are prepared to listen to anyone. Your input in this matter could potentially be very valuable. Don’t fuck it up by being a jackass about it. Either engage our membership in a sincere debate, or stop posting altogether. And I can assure you the Staff could be of assistance in achieving the latter.