It’s not the content it is the technique of repeating a Big Lie and in this respect unless we concede that Rice, Bush et al are so monumentally ignorant or incompetent that they still believe what they say then the comparison is totally valid.
The evidence clearly shows they lied at the time and knew they were lying and they continue to repeat the lie for political ends.
Which, as I noted, was a valid point of nuanced comparison. However, throwing out the “Nazi” claim is the equivalent of rhetorically “going nuclear.” It brings all discussion to a halt because you have framed the discussion so that anyone who accepts the administration position on any topic is now aligned with “the Nazis” with all the baggage that that entails. It may be true that Goebbels happened to coin the phrase “big lie,” but it is not true that he created the practice and one can use many of the events from U.S. history (among many others) to make the same point without implying that the Bush administration has an ultimate goal of exterminating millions of people and enslaving tens millions more. Throwing the “Nazi” bomb does equate its target with the Holocaust and WWII, no matter how many disclaimers you want to post about “technique.”
That is not a ‘disclaimer’ it is what I was trying to say and what others are trying to say. Because the Nazi’s used the Big Lie technique does not preclude others using the same technique and does not give those using the Big Lie technique a free pass on being called for it.
In fact they should be called on it explicitly with reference to the Nazi’s because they and their supporters need to be shamed and should be ashamed to be using a Nazi technique.
none of this should detract from the fact I was totally wrong to make the Herr remark. That was just plain wrong of me. By ‘they’ and ‘supporter’ I mean politicians and their media mouthpieces like Coulter.
Ignorant? Or maybe deliberate?
Here are some quotes:
Compare these statements to what are known facts and draw your own conclusions.
Quick question for anyone who cares to grab it.
With all the evidence that’s come forth, why is the level of outrage so anemic in the US? I mean, sure, there are pockets of indignation here and there, but, overall, it appears that Joe Sixpack isn’t really that bothered by the fact that your nation went to war based on a pack of – demonstrable – lies.
Puzzled.
Vulgas vult decepi (the people wish to be deceived).
Been out of the country and out of communications for quite a while now. Looks like I’m just a ‘member’ now. Ah well, c’est la vie. Still my favorite message board.
I’ll start off by trying to tackle this one before dipping into this thread more.
Couple of reasons I see off the top of my head. First off, I think ‘indignation’ is building here…its just building slowly. The anti-war crowd wanted it to happen immediately, but using the (bad) example most tossed about of Vietnam, protest there didn’t happen in a day…it took years to build up, and even then its debatable if the majority of American’s were against the war.
Secondly, and not trying to diminish the US men and women who have lost their lives, for the US the casualties have been relatively light. Again, the attempt to portray the conflict as catastrophic to the US by the anti-war crowd was premature IMO…it just never got to that level (at least not yet). As for Iraqi casualties…well, I doubt most American’s really think much on that to be honest.
Thirdly, the US public was pre-conditioned to being hostile to Iraq, so even if they are coming to the slow realization that there were myriad, er, adjustings of the truth lets say, its hard to build up sympathy for Saddam and his regime either, so its kind of a wash…thus general US apathy concerning the war. Atm. Again, I think that the longer this goes on with a trickle of US casualties, as long as the insurgency continues its low grade rumbling, the more support or even apathy will errode and the more resentments will build up. Thats just my opinion of course.
Lastly, I don’t know how informed the general population is on all the in’s and out’s of the ‘Bush lied’ debate. One problem I see is the crying wolf aspects of the anti-war/anti-Bush crowd early in the game. A lot of folks became fed up with the constant babble of anti-Bush rhetoric, and then, when facts started coming out that a lot of the case for war was built on a house of cards, such things were dismissed as just more anti-Bush rhetoric. I have to admit that until recently I was actually in this group, and until I went and dug into the facts myself I dismissed a lot of the ‘Bush lied!’ stuff as simply rhetoric. I doubt that most American’s are going to spend an entire evening digging that deeply.
-XT
It doesn’t help that our “independent” “liberal” media thinks we’d rather hear about the Michael Jackson trial and runaway brides instead of stuff like this. Getting on the Bush Administration’s bad side doesn’t help the CEOs in the long term…
Short answer: We won. Yeah, the insurgency is still going on, but we won. Joe Sixpack takes pride in that. “We’re #1”
Spiff,
Responses like this are illustrate why I will never listen or give weight to your arguements or those of your fellow Bush apologists. I comapred the tactics of this presidential administration regarding propaganda with the Nazi government’s use of propaganda. And that is what Secretary Rice used: the oft-told lie.
And I am a true American by any definition you wish to use. Your condemnation of me implies that I am unAmerican. If you say that I cannot criticize the behavior of our government and say it is wrong, you are definitely the one being unAmerican, sir. You and others like you, Tail-Gunner Joe!
Welcome back XT, you were missed. Check out Airman Doors new angle.
Damn right. Spiff is trying to “put the Coulter move” on you.
Dissent = treason.
Doubt = treason
If anything, the refusal to question the motives and intentions of government is completely “American”. It is blind faith and total obedience that are unAmerican.
The first was supposed to say
If anything, the refusal to question the motives and intentions of government is completely “unAmerican”.
Hey, xt, thanx for the reply and welcome back. Quick comment.
I think the first three reasons you give go to the heart of my question re:Joe Sixpack. However, the last – and IMHO, the most important – only applies to people such as yourself. I’ll try to explain. The anti-war side had/has the answers to all three of those all along, and as many people have pointed out and as ultimatedly, you yourself found out, the answers were there to be found all along. And as you also well know, it took work and an attention span beyond that of a sound bite or a poignant image – a la anthax vial at the UN. To this day, as your own history confirms, I really see no work-around. I mean, surely you’re aware of the recently leaked Dearlove memo? Why wasn’t it a lead story in every media outlet in the US? Not that it was exactly ‘news’ for anyone that had been doing their homework all along. Hell, if you want a synopsis of what we’ve been saying all along (yes, I know, right about now, that’s the last thing you need) try Cook’s resignation speech and note the date of same!
Anyway, I’m not really arguing with you, just saying that I don’t hold out much (none?) hope for the average American to go through what you did to arrive at your conclusions. Just hope it doesn’t take a larger catastrophe than we’re currently witnessing to wake them. In that sense, I agree with rjung’s and BrainGlutton’s concise replies.
Jingoism and propaganda can only carry you so far. You’re nearing the very edge as it is. Again, as I posted upthread, not trying to be overly dramatic, but rather pragmatic. Hell’s bells! I go into a colmado* here for a near-frozen Presidente beer, strike up a casual conversation with the locals, and almost to a one, the most seemingly ignorant peon will tell you the same thing: Bush lied, they went there for the oil. Oversimplification mayhaps, but still much closer to the truth than the majority of Americans who decided Bush deserved another term.
That’s what so puzzling to me!
*Latin version of a minimart – just much noisier and dingier…but a hell of a lot of fun! 
PS-for beer-lovers, this is Presidente. Good stuff!
</end hijack>
There isn’t a shadow of doubt in my mind that it is all a deliberate lie. It is not possible to believe that stripping out all the caveats from intelligence, the misrepresentation of facts, the continued and continuing repetitions of known falsehoods is ignorance. Occams’ Razor dictates that in the light of the available evidence, the Deerlove memo being only the most recent, deliberate lying is the simplest explanation.
I’ve been advocating the overthrow of Saddam since before Rumsfeld was selling him arms but war is too serious a business for a democratic country to allow itself to be lied into.