Oh, man. That song so rocks.
Okay, my babay Sawyer isn;t getting anywhere so I am putting myself out here.
I have been using TreSemme shampoo and conditioner for quite a while. I love what it does for my hair and it is inexpensive.
There was a time when Wal Mart had some of these TreSemme condiotioners in pump form on sale. Woohoo. I bought a couple. I was ecstatic because I had a pump thingie. It was cool.
Fast Forward 3 months later, there were no more pump bottles for sale, so I had to pump the conditioner that was left in the bottle to the next bottle andf there I was slurping bottles of conditioner.
Okay so I claim the the pump version of conditi0ner.This version of conditioner is
I was not stating my opinion or your opinion. I had one of those cite thingies that said I was correct. And I saw more in those dictionary things that all the kids are using now. The way we speak and write changes. Just ask Chaucer.
But good luck trying to get him to understand you. 
I have no idea what you’re trying to say, but I have to ask why you didn’t just pour the new conditioner into the old pump bottle so you could still use the pump bottle, and just keep refilling it?
Im in ur dikshunary, chanjin ur spellinz.
OpaLOLCat?
For oute of olde feldys, as men sey, Comyth al this newe corn from yere to yere; And out of old bokis, in good fey, Comyth al this newe science that men lere.
I quite agree with Loach’s position. Americans should start spelling the “butter” as “budder”, as that’s how they pronounce it, anyway. The English will spell it “buttah”. The Scots shall spell it “bu’ah”. Everybody’s happy!
A piece of mail was delivered for my ex-neighbor (who has moved). Her last name is “Schubert,” but the mailing label said “Scherbert.”
[list=a]
[li]How upset should she be?[/li][li]How upset should I be?[/li][li](Oh alright) Hi, Opal.[/li][/list]
This is not the end point of the English language. It will evolve and change. Especially with a word like sherbet. It comes from Turkish. In the 17th century it was kept pure because it was close to it’s origins. Gradually it changes to a form that flows better in English. It is no longer a Turkish word. That is what happens. And I don’t know anyone who says budder, except on SNL.
But I will join you on the barricades if they try to make irregardless a word.
While watching The Addams Family today on TV Land, I finally came to the realization that Lurch, the Arquillian prince from Men in Black, and Mr. Homn from Star Trek: TNG were all the same actor, Carel Struycken. Ridiculously obvious, since how many men are there that height? But it never clicked until now.
I’m already there, inveighing against people who spell possessive “its” with an apostrophe. 
If you hang out with jazz players, you’ll still hear “cat(s)” used as a placeholder for a (group of) male jazz musician(s) occasionally, eg “That cat can really swing” and “You gotta have the right cats up there with you”.
Then neither are words like “you” and “color” really and truly correct. In fact, your description describes just about every word in the English language: they’re in there because they’re used and recognized.
Don’t you think that the use of “ur” is systematic, not accidental?
BTW, Abby_Emma_Sasha, I have no idea what the hell you’re talking about.
I’ve given up on the phrase “begging the question” as it seems no one ever uses it in its original sense.
I’ll save everyone else jumping to correct you to point out that despite watching it on TV Land, you must have been watching the Addams Family movie to have seen Struycken as Lurch. Those of us who are still adjusting to TV Land showing movies all sprained ourselves trying to rush to inform you that Lurch was played on TV by Ted Cassidy.
Regarding the language evolving… I agree that it does, however I think that the way it changed in the past and the way it changes now/in the future are different. In the past people’s access to formal education was more limited. Standardizations of things like spelling were also not as widespread or accessible. In today’s world we have dictionaries and the internet to use as reference, which are available to just about everyone. The excuse, therefore, for things like misspellings, is much less. Obviously there are new words coming into being; there always will be. Obviously as culture evolves, new usages will be found for existing words; there always will be. However, I find very little reason to find it “ok” to say that since a bunch of people are too stupid or lazy to look things up that a flat-out misspelling should become an acceptable “alternate spelling” in the future of the language. You’re welcome to disagree with me, but I think it’s ignorance and the fact that dictionaries will eventually concede that “a bunch of people get it wrong like this, so that’s also what people mean when they spell it like this” does not change my opinion.
That I was. I actually forget that it was a TV series first, since the movie was my first real introduction to the Addamses. I consider Raul Julia the ‘real’ Gomez over John Astin. :o
Same here…what the heck did your (Abby_Emma_Sasha’s) post mean?
wow, how did you manage that?
I was 9 when the movie came out, and at the time was not interested in anything black and white.